turanВестник университета «Туран»Bulletin of "Turan" University1562-29592959-1236Университет «Туран»10.46914/1562-2959-2023-1-2-130-142turan-3414Research ArticleЭКОНОМИКА: ИСТОРИЯ, ТЕОРИЯ, ПРАКТИКАECONOMY: HISTORY, THEORY, PRACTICEОценка стратегий (программ) развития регионов Казахстана на соответствие критериям модели «умная специализация»Assessment of strategies (programs) for the development of Kazakhstan’s regions for compliance with the citeria of the “smart specialization” modelhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3937-6940КурмановН. А.KurmanovN. A.

PhD, профессор-исследователь

г. Астана

PhD, professor-researcher

Almaty

Kurmanov_NA@enu.kzhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6152-2457УскеленоваА. Т.UskelenovaA. T.

д.э.н.

г. Астана

d.e.s.

Almaty

assol_74_leo@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0215-1502КабдуллинаГ. К.KabdullinaG. K.

д.э.н., профессор

г. Костанай

d.e.s., professor.

Kostanay

asilhan1996@mail.ruЕвразийский национальный университет им. Л.Н. ГумилеваКазахстанL.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National UniversityKazakhstanКазахский национальный университет им. аль-ФарабиКазахстанAl-Farabi Kazakh National UniversityKazakhstanКостанайский социально-технический университет им. З. АлдамжарКазахстанKostanay Social and Technical University named after Z. AldamzharKazakhstan20230407202302130142Copyright © Курманов Н.А., Ускеленова А.Т., Кабдуллина Г.К., 20232023Курманов Н.А., Ускеленова А.Т., Кабдуллина Г.К.Kurmanov N.A., Uskelenova A.T., Kabdullina G.K.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://vestnik.turan-edu.kz/jour/article/view/3414

Объектом исследования является гипотеза: большинство признаков модели «умная специализация» присутствуют как минимум формально в традиционных стратегиях развития регионов Казахстана. «Чистым» условием для проверки гипотезы является отсутствие словосочетания «умная специализация» в стратегиях (программах) регионального развития с 2012–2021 гг.; отсутствие указаний на то, что модель «умная специализация» принималась во внимание; отсутствие соответствующих директив со стороны органов государственной власти. В статье дается оценка стратегий инновационного развития выбранных регионов Казахстана на соответствие критериям модели «умная специализация». Информационной базой исследования послужили открытые источники: специализированные базы нормативных и правовых актов, официальные интернет-сайты акиматов регионов. Для тестирования выдвинутой гипотезы исследования применен адаптированный метод умной специализации RIS3 Self-Assessment Wheel (Колесо самооценки инновационных стратегий региона умной специализации). Базовая методика Европейской комиссии базируется на балльных оценках (по шкале 0–5) стратегий регионов по 18 критериям, которые детализируют 6 шагов по созданию и развитию региональной стратегии умной специализации. После завершения оценки региональных стратегий (программ) окончательный результат оформлен в виде диаграммы «паутина», на которой выделены сильные и слабые стороны инновационного развития рассмотренных регионов.

The object of the research is the hypothesis: most of the features of the “smart specialization” model are present, at least formally, in the traditional development strategies of the regions of Kazakhstan. The “pure” condition for testing the hypothesis is the absence of the phrase “smart specialization” in the strategies (programs) of regional development from 2012 to 2021; lack of indications that the “smart specialization” model was taken into account; lack of appropriate directives from the state authorities. The article evaluates the strategies of innovative development of selected regions of Kazakhstan according to the criteria of the “smart specialization” model. The information base of the research was served by open sources: specialized bases of normative and legal acts, official websites of regions. Adapted method of smart specialization RIS3 Self-Assessment Wheel was used for testing the advanced research hypothesis. The basic methodology of the European Commission is based on point evaluations (on a scale of 0–5) of strategic regions according to 18 criteria, which detail 6 steps for the creation and development of a regional strategy of smart specialization. After completing the assessment of regional strategies (programs), the final result was presented in the form of a “web” diagram, on which the strengths and weaknesses of the innovative development of the considered regions were highlighted.

инновационное развитиеколесо самооценкиинновационные стратегиирегионмеханизмы управленияумная специализацияinnovative developmentself-assessment wheelinnovation strategiesregionmanagement mechanismssmart specializationReferencesEuropean Commission. Regional Policy Contributing to Smart Growth in Europe 2020. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions (COM (2010) 553 final). Brussels: European Commission, 2018. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/communic/smart_growth/comm2010_553_en.pdf (accessed: 18.01.2023)European Commission. Regional Policy Contributing to Smart Growth in Europe 2020. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions (COM (2010) 553 final). Brussels: European Commission, 2018. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/communic/smart_growth/comm2010_553_en.pdf (accessed: 18.01.2023)Kirzner I.M. Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1973. 3 Foray D., David P., Hall B. Smart specialization – The concept // Knowledge Economists Policy Brief. 2009, no. 9(85), pp. 1–5.Kirzner I.M. Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1973. 3 Foray D., David P., Hall B. Smart specialization – The concept // Knowledge Economists Policy Brief. 2009, no. 9(85), pp. 1–5.Landabaso M., Foray D. From smart specialisation to smart specialisation policy. European Journal of Innovation Management. 2014, no. 17(4), pp. 492–507.Landabaso M., Foray D. From smart specialisation to smart specialisation policy. European Journal of Innovation Management. 2014, no. 17(4), pp. 492–507.Landabaso M., McCann P., Ortega-Argilés R. Smart specialisation in European regions: Issues of strategy, institutions and implementation. European Journal of Innovation Management. 2014, no. 17(4), pp. 409–427.Landabaso M., McCann P., Ortega-Argilés R. Smart specialisation in European regions: Issues of strategy, institutions and implementation. European Journal of Innovation Management. 2014, no. 17(4), pp. 409–427.Boschma R. Smart Specialisation and Regional Innovation Policy. Welsh Economic Review. 2016, no. 24, pp. 17.Boschma R. Smart Specialisation and Regional Innovation Policy. Welsh Economic Review. 2016, no. 24, pp. 17.Foray D. Smart Specialisation – Opportunities and Challenges for Regional Innovation Policy (1st ed.). London: Routledge, 2015.Foray D. Smart Specialisation – Opportunities and Challenges for Regional Innovation Policy (1st ed.). London: Routledge, 2015.Asheim B.T. Smart specialisation, innovation policy and regional innovation systems: What about new path development in less innovative regions? Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. 2018, no. 32(1), pp. 8–25.Asheim B.T. Smart specialisation, innovation policy and regional innovation systems: What about new path development in less innovative regions? Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. 2018, no. 32(1), pp. 8–25.Crespo J., Balland P.-A., Boschma R., Rigby D. Regional Diversification Opportunities and Smart Specialization Strategies. Brussels: European Commission, 2017.Crespo J., Balland P.-A., Boschma R., Rigby D. Regional Diversification Opportunities and Smart Specialization Strategies. Brussels: European Commission, 2017.McCann P., Ortega-Argilés R. Smart Specialization, Regional Growth and Applications to European Union Cohesion Policy. Regional Studies. 2013, no. 49(8), pp. 1291–1302.McCann P., Ortega-Argilés R. Smart Specialization, Regional Growth and Applications to European Union Cohesion Policy. Regional Studies. 2013, no. 49(8), pp. 1291–1302.Boschma R. Constructing Regional Advantage and Smart Specialization: Comparison of Two European Policy Concepts. Evolutionary Economic Geography Series Paper No. 13.22. Utrecht: University of Utrecht, 2013.Boschma R. Constructing Regional Advantage and Smart Specialization: Comparison of Two European Policy Concepts. Evolutionary Economic Geography Series Paper No. 13.22. Utrecht: University of Utrecht, 2013.Kotnik P., Petrin T. Implementing a smart specialisation strategy: An evidence-based approach. International Review of Administrative Sciences. 2017, no. 83(1), pp. 85–105.Kotnik P., Petrin T. Implementing a smart specialisation strategy: An evidence-based approach. International Review of Administrative Sciences. 2017, no. 83(1), pp. 85–105.European Union. The role of clusters in smart specialisation strategies: Directorate General for Research and Innovation. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2013.European Union. The role of clusters in smart specialisation strategies: Directorate General for Research and Innovation. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2013.European Commission. RIS3 guide. Brussels: European Commission, 2012.European Commission. RIS3 guide. Brussels: European Commission, 2012.Smart specialisation platform. 2011. URL: s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/s3-platform (accessed: 18.01.2023).Smart specialisation platform. 2011. URL: s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/s3-platform (accessed: 18.01.2023).Turgel I., Bozhko L., Ulyanova E. ‘Smart city’concept in digital economics: practice of Russia and Kazakhstan // International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies. 2022, no. 16(2–4), pp. 139– 157.Turgel I., Bozhko L., Ulyanova E. ‘Smart city’concept in digital economics: practice of Russia and Kazakhstan // International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies. 2022, no. 16(2–4), pp. 139– 157.Satybaldin A.A., Nurlanova N.K., Kireyeva A.A. A New Policy of Spatial Development of Kazakhstan on the Principles of Inclusiveness and Smart Specialization // The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business. 2016, no. 3(3), рр. 93–102.Satybaldin A.A., Nurlanova N.K., Kireyeva A.A. A New Policy of Spatial Development of Kazakhstan on the Principles of Inclusiveness and Smart Specialization // The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business. 2016, no. 3(3), рр. 93–102.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.