<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">turan</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник университета «Туран»</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Bulletin of "Turan" University</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1562-2959</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2959-1236</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Университет «Туран»</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">turan-622</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ТРИБУНА МОЛОДОГО ИССЛЕДОВАТЕЛЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>PLATFORM OF YOUNG RESEARCHER</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title></article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>On the theory and modern practice of project quality management</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kaldyoraz</surname><given-names>A. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">noemail@neicon.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="en">Al-Farabi Kazakh National University<country>Kazakhstan</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2020</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>03</day><month>12</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>189</fpage><lpage>193</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Kaldyoraz A.A., 2020</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Kaldyoraz A.A.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Kaldyoraz A.A.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://vestnik.turan-edu.kz/jour/article/view/622">https://vestnik.turan-edu.kz/jour/article/view/622</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье рассматриваются различные подходы к определению термина «управление проектом», а также происхождение такой науки, как управление проектами. Управление проектами следует различать как практическую деятельность и как научную дисциплину. Управление проектами возникло как практическая деятельность в древние времена, когда человечество столкнулось с необходимостью реализации первых крупных проектов. Формирование управления проектами как научно-теоретической дисциплины произошло в середине и второй половине XX в. Важную роль в создании предмета управления проектами сыграли профессиональные ассоциации управления проектами. В статье проведен научный обзор данной области знаний в мировом масштабе, а также рассмотрена практика ближнего зарубежья и Казахстана. Проведен анализ слабых сторон управления качеством проекта в Казахстане, приведены причины, указывающие на необходимость развития данного направления научного знания в республике. В работе приведена статистика, основанная на данных Института проектного менеджмента в США, показывающая эффективность применения проектного управления. Проведен анализ причин снижения эффективности или провала проектов, основанный на результатах исследования успешности проектов, анализ структуры управления качеством проекта, подходов к трактовке данного понятия. Описываются методы и этапы всеобщего управления качеством, их влияние на реализацию работ по проекту, формируются рекомендации в рамках каждого метода. Приводятся методы измерения результативности работ и их качества с конкретизацией их сильных и слабых сторон. Через призму международных требований к системам менеджмента качества рассмотрены вопросы компетентности персонала, его обучения и повышения квалификации, всеобщей вовлеченности участников команды проекта и высшего руководства в процесс управления качеством проекта.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article discusses various approaches to the definition of the term "project management", as well as the origin of a science called project management. Project management should be distinguished as a practical activity and as a scientific subect. Project management emerged as a practical activity in ancient times, when humanity faced the need to implement the first major projects. The formation of project management as a scientific and theoretical subject occurred in the middle and second half of the XX century. Professional associations of project management played an important role in creating the subject of project management. The article provides a scientific overview of this field of knowledge on a global scale, as well as the practice of neighboring countries and Kazakhstan. The analysis of the weak points of project quality management in Kazakhstan is carried out, and the reasons for the need to develop this area of scientific knowledge in the Republic are given. The paper presents statistics based on data from the Institute of project management in the United States, showing the effectiveness of project management. The analysis of the reasons for reducing the effectiveness or failure of projects, based on the results of research on the success of projects, the analysis of the structure of project quality management, approaches to the interpretation of this concept are carried out. The methods and stages of general quality management are described, their impact on the implementation of the project, and recommendations are formed within each method. The methods of measuring the performance of work and their quality with specification of their strengths and weaknesses are given. Through the prism of international requirements for quality management systems, the issues of personnel competence, their training and professional development, the universal involvement of project team members and senior management in the project quality management process are considered.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>project management</kwd><kwd>quality of management</kwd><kwd>performance evaluation</kwd><kwd>communication</kwd><kwd>educational processes</kwd><kwd>personnel competence</kwd><kwd>управление проектами</kwd><kwd>качество менеджмента</kwd><kwd>оценка эффективности</kwd><kwd>коммуникации</kwd><kwd>образовательные процессы</kwd><kwd>компетентность персонала</kwd><kwd>жобаны басқару</kwd><kwd>басқару сапасы</kwd><kwd>тиімділікті бағалау</kwd><kwd>тиімділік</kwd><kwd>коммуникациялар</kwd><kwd>оқу процестері</kwd><kwd>қызметкердің құзыреттілігі</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kerzner H. Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling and controlling. - John Wiley &amp; Sons, 2017.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kerzner H. Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling and controlling. - John Wiley &amp; Sons, 2017.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Meredith J.R., Shafer S.M., Mantel Jr S.J. Project management: a systematic approach to planning and control. - John Wiley &amp; Sons, 2017.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Meredith J.R., Shafer S.M., Mantel Jr S.J. Project management: a systematic approach to planning and control. - John Wiley &amp; Sons, 2017.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Heagney J. Basics of Project Management. - Amacom, 2016.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Heagney J. Basics of Project Management. - Amacom, 2016.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fleming Q.W., Koppelman J.M. Earned value project management. - Project Management Institute, 2016.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fleming Q.W., Koppelman J.M. Earned value project management. - Project Management Institute, 2016.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kerzner H. Project management best practices: Achieving global excellence. - John Wiley &amp; Sons, 2018.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kerzner H. Project management best practices: Achieving global excellence. - John Wiley &amp; Sons, 2018.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Marchewka J.T. Information technology project management: providing measurable organizational value. - John Wiley &amp; Sons, 2016.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Marchewka J.T. Information technology project management: providing measurable organizational value. - John Wiley &amp; Sons, 2016.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Radujković M., Sjekavica M. Project management success factors // Procedia engineering. 2017. Т. 196. P. 607-615.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Radujković M., Sjekavica M. Project management success factors // Procedia engineering. 2017. Т. 196. P. 607-615.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Samset K., Volden G.H. External definition of projects: ten paradoxes and some reflections on project management and administration // International Journal of Project Management. 2016. Т. 34. No. 2. P. 297-313.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Samset K., Volden G.H. External definition of projects: ten paradoxes and some reflections on project management and administration // International Journal of Project Management. 2016. Т. 34. No. 2. P. 297-313.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Silvius G. Sustainability as a new school of thought in project management // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017. Т. 166. P. 1479-1493.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Silvius G. Sustainability as a new school of thought in project management // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017. Т. 166. P. 1479-1493.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Padalkar M., Gopinath S. Six decades of project management research: thematic trends and future possibilities // International Journal of Project Management. 2016. Т. 34. No. 7. P. 1305-1321.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Padalkar M., Gopinath S. Six decades of project management research: thematic trends and future possibilities // International Journal of Project Management. 2016. Т. 34. No. 7. P. 1305-1321.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
