Social entrepreneurship: theory and practice

This article examines the existing approaches to the interpretation of the concept of "social entrepreneurship". Social entrepreneurship, as a field of scientific research, in the process of its formation is characterized by insufficient definition of theoretical boundaries, content and conceptual apparatus. The need to clarify the definition of social entrepreneurship will determine the format of its use and development in the process of growing contradictions between social and economic problems and, in the context of the global Covid-19 pandemic that has embraced all countries of the world. Being one of the actively developing forms of entrepreneurial activity, today social entrepreneurship is designed to solve problems affecting the improvement of the level of well-being and quality of life of both socially vulnerable groups of the population and society as a whole. Kazakhstan's experience of social entrepreneurship is a new trend in the development of the economy. Crowdfunding and fundraising should be mentioned as innovative and used tools in the foreign practice of social entrepreneurship. The realities of the current crisis indicate that the adaptation of people of a socially vulnerable group in society, the growth of their social and economic activity are becoming one of the many tasks that social entrepreneurship is designed to implement. In this regard, it is necessary to actively cooperate with state structures, the business and social sectors. The article uses general scientific principles and methods of logical analysis, synthesis, ascent from the abstract to the concrete, as well as a system of general methodological principles of dialectical cognition of social reality as the methodological basis of the research.

1. Jekonomika koronаvirusa: kak strany mira spasajutsja ot krizisa v uslovijah pandemii [The economy of the coronavirus: how the countries of the world are saving themselves from the crisis in a pandemic]. [Jelektronnyj resurs]: https://www.unian.net/economics/finance/10919504-ekonomika-koronavirusa-kakstrany-mira-spasayutsya-v-usloviyah-pandemii.html. (Data obrashhenija: 20.10.2020).

2. Drayton B. (2012) Empathy-Based Ethics: A Strategic Essential. Forbes India. (Data obrashhenija: 26 ijunja).

3. Keohane G.L. (2013) Social Entrepreneurship for the 21st Century: Innovation across the Nonprofit, Private, and Public Sectors. McGraw Hill Professional, pp. 97-263 – ISBN 0071801677, 978007180.

4. J.Gregory Dees (1998) The Meaning of Social Entrepreneurship. CASE at Duke, 5 p.

5. Rodzher L. Martin, Osberg S. (2014) Social entrepreneurship: The case for definition. NKO «Jevoljucija i Filantropija», 19 p. (Data obrashhenija: 30 nojabrja 2020 g.).

6. Springer Gabler (2012) Social Entrepreneurship and Social Business. An Introduction and Discussion with Case Studies. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler – 227 p. – ISBN 978-3-8349-7093-0.

7. Barinova V. (2018) Zarubezhnyj opyt razvitija soc]ial'nogo predprinimatel'stva i vozmozhnost' ego primenenija v Rossii [Foreign experience in the development of social entrepreneurship and the possibility of its application in Russia]. Izd-vo In-ta Gajdara, 100 p. il. – (Nauchnye trudy / In-t jekonomicheskoj politiki im. E.T. Gajdara; No 174P). – ISBN 978-5-93255-532-3.

8. Zhohova V.V. (2015) Social'noe predprinimatel'stvo: koncepcija, sushhnost' i znachenie [Social entrepreneurship: concept, essence and meaning]. Sovremennaja konkurencija – T. 9. – № 4(52), pp. 77–99.

9. Problemy social'nogo predprinimatel'stva dolzhny bolee shiroko osveshhat'sja v SMI [The problems of social entrepreneurship should be more widely covered in the media.]. Vteme.kz. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. http:// vteme.kz/news/problemy_socialnogo_predprinimatelstva_dolzhny_bolee_shiroko_osveshhatsja_v_smi/2017- 09-19-217. (Data obrashhenija: 15.07.2020).

10. Pritvorova T.P., Gelashvili N.N., Zhumanova B.K. (2019) Social'noe predprinimatel'stvo v Respublike Kazahstan: problemy i perspektivy razvitija [Social entrepreneurship in the Republic of Kazakhstan: problems and development prospects]. Kreativnaja jekonomika, Tom 13. – № 2. – pp. 231–238. – doi: 10.18334/ ce.13.2.39919.