Implementation of foreign experience on effective management of urbanization processes in Kazakhstan

The article is devoted to the study of modern trends in the process of urbanization management in developed countries and the development of recommendations on the application of management tools to the acceptable realities of Kazakhstan. The administrative processes of urbanization of the countries of Poland, India, China, Latin America, etc. were interesting and priority objects of research. The work was written on the basis of studying the development of cities and generalizing all the emerging connections as a single system. The information base of the study was the works of well-known foreign and domestic scientists on the topic of urbanization, as well as statistical materials and ratings of the countries of the world on the level of urbanization of the UN.A distinctive aspect of the study is the analysis of urbanization management in the countries of Poland, India, China, Latin America in relation to specific problems. The article gives the basic characteristics of the urbanization process in Kazakhstan, identifies the distinctive features and factors constraining the effectiveness of urban development management based on the works of Kazakhstani scientists and economists, which identified a number of key problems of the urbanization management process in our country.The results of the study are of a recommendatory nature, determining priority approaches to using foreign experience and adapting it to the realities of the Kazakh model, which can be considered when implementing urban development management programs by authorized bodies.

1. Loseva A.Ju. (2019) Paradigmy i metodologii izuchenija urbanizacii // Social'no-jekonomicheskoe razvitie Rossii i Mongolii: problemy i perspektivy. P. 193–197. (In Russian).

2. World Bank. International Monetary Fund. Global Monitoring Report 2013: Rural-Urban Dynamics and the Millennium Development Goals. The World Bank, 2013. (In English).

3. Percik E.N. (2017) Teoreticheskie predposylki upravlenija processami urbanizacii // Innovacii i investicii. No. 6. P. 2–5. (In Russian).

4. Moljarenko O.A. (2013) Raspredelennyj obraz zhizni i kontrurbanizacionnye processy kak faktory razvitija sel'skih i gorodskih poselenij // Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i municipal'nogo upravlenija. No. 1. URL: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/raspredelennyy-obraz-zhizni-ikontrurbanizatsionnye-protsessy-kak-faktory-razvitiya-selskih-i-gorodskihposeleniy. (In Russian).

5. Rejting stran mira po urovnju urbanizacii. URL: https://gtmarket.ru/ratings/urbanization-index. (In Russian).

6. Romanovskij V.M., Romanovskaja O.G. (2018) Upravlenie gorodskimi aglomeracijami: pol'skij opyt // Sovremennoe upravlenie: vektory razvitija. P. 107–110. (In Russian).

7. New Town Kolkata // Development Authority West Bengal. URL: https://www.nkdamar.org/Pages/index.aspx. (In English).

8. Biswas A., Singh O. (2017) Rajarhat New Town an Urban Perspective: A Case Study of Urbanization, West Bengal, India // International Journal of New Technology and Research, no. 3(5), pp. 39–44. (In English).

9. Fjengan U. (2015) Issledovanie ustojchivogo razvitija processa urbanizacii v Kitae // Jekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny: fakty, tendencii, prognoz. No. 4(40). – P. 165–170. (In Russian).

10. Wei L., Tingting C., Xun L. (2016) A new style of urbanization in China: Transformation of urban rural communities // Habitat International, no. 55. P. 1–9. (In English).

11. AUBE. News report on Jiaochangwei urban regeneration project. 2014. URL: http://www.aube-archi.com/news/201408/content_684.html. (In English).

12. Participatory Innovation and Representative Democracy in Latin America / A. Selee, E. Peruzzotti (eds.). Washington D.C.; Baltimore MD: Woodrow Wilson Center; The Johns Hopkins University Presses, 2009. (In English).

13. Avritzer L. (2009) Participatory Institutions in Democratic Brazil. Washington D.C.; Baltimore MD: Woodrow Wilson Center; The Johns Hopkins University Presses (In English).

14. Wampler B., McNulty S.L. (2011) Does Participatory Governance Matter? Exploring the Nature and Impact of Participatory Reforms. Washington D.C.: The Woodrow Wilson Center. P. 7. (In English).

15. Global Urban Poverty. Setting the Agenda / A.M. Garland, M. Massoumi, B.A. Ruble (eds.). Washington D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Center Comparative Urban Studies Project, 2007. (In English).

16. Nixon J.H., Weiss M.A. (2011) Sustainable Economic Development Strategies. Washington D.C.: Global Urban Development. (In English).

17. Dzhunusbekova G., Daueshova A., Muhametzhan S. (2018) Aktual'nye aspekty upravlenija urbanizirovannymi territorijami v Respublike Kazahstan // Spektr. No. 2(84). P. 63–78. (In Russian).

18. Jashkov I.A., Ivanov A.V. (2018) Nekotorye problemy urbanizacii i jevoljucii seti poselenij Kazahstana v XX-XXI vekah // Glavnyj redaktor. P. 225–229. (In Russian).

19. Dzhumabaev S.K. (2014) Urbanizacija i industrializacija v Kazahstane: vzaimosvjaz', sostojanie i perspektivy // KazNU Bulletin. Economic series. No. 2(102). P. 3–11. (In Russian).

20. Koshanov A. (2019) Urbanizacija i social'nye problemy territorial'nogo razvitija // Obshhestvo i jekonomika. No. 2. P. 64–82. (In Russian).

21. Kenzhebekov N.D., Zhuspekova A.K., Zambinova G.K. (2016) Jekologija goroda: problemy i ogranichenija razvitija //Aktual'nі problemi ekonomіki. No. 7. P. 249–255. (In Russian).

22. Nurlanova N.K. (2016) Goroda kak tochki rosta jekonomicheskogo prostranstva Kazahstana: tendencii i perspektivy razvitija // Problemy razvitija territorii. No. 5(85). P. 201–215. (In Russian).