Practice-oriented education as a response to the challenges of modern world
https://doi.org/10.46914/1562-2959-2023-1-3-415-427
Abstract
The modern world is a world that requires us to have a certain way of thinking, a non-standard approach to solving problems that arise in connection with digitalization and dynamic technological changes. The in-demand intelligence of today combines proven methods and strategies with new ways to apply them and creative ways to build them. In order for education to ensure the formation of such qualities in students, it is necessary to look for training formats that would focus on adaptability, flexibility of thinking, creativity, problem-centeredness, etc. Within the framework of the proposed article, a model of practice-oriented education is described, implemented at the D. Serikbaev East Kazakhstan Technical University (hereinafter EKTU). The purpose of the article is to highlight and justify the importance of the process of modernization of vocational education through the introduction of a practiceoriented concept of education. Practice-oriented education is interpreted as the interaction of the university and its partners for the maximum development of professional competencies and practical experience. Network cooperation with enterprises of the region and the country, on the one hand, and with leading universities and research centers, on the other, makes it possible to strengthen the activities of educational programs. One of the ways to introduce such a format of education at the university is highlighted. The level system of its implementation is also described, which consists in the phased formation of practical competencies among graduate school students and students throughout their studies at the university. The creation of a digital profile of a student’s competencies, as a result of the acquired and demonstrated competencies, is part of the implementation of such a level education. The paper also considers the concepts of SPOD-, VUCAand BANI worlds, the challenges and requirements of which determine the reformatting of the educational paradigm.
About the Authors
S. Zh. RakhmetullinaKazakhstan
c.t.s., associate professor.
Ust-Kamenogosk
Zh. T. Konurbayeva
Kazakhstan
c.e.s., associate professor.
Ust-Kamenogosk
D. S. Surova
Kazakhstan
c.ph.s., senior lecturer.
Ust-Kamenogosk
References
1. Kulyasova E.V., Trifonov P.V. (2020) Development of forms of interaction between universities and the business community in the digital economy // Strategic decisions and risk management, no. 11(2), pp. 216–223. URL: https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2020-2-216-223. (In English).
2. Fernandes J.M., Afonso R. Engineering education in a context of VUCA // 4th International Conference of the Portuguese Society for Engineering Education (CISPEE). 2021. DOI: 10.1109/CISPEE47794.2021.9507229. (In English).
3. Bennett N.G., Lemoine J. (2014) What VUCA Really Means for You // Harvard Business Review. (In English).
4. Diachok N., Chernukha N. and other. (2020) Practical-Oriented Concept as a Principle of Professional Education of the Future Professionals // International Journal of Higher Education. Vol. 9. No. 4. P. 272–282. (In English).
5. Minervin I.G. (2014) Praktiko-orientirovannaja model' podgotovki sovremennogo specialista. Monografija / I.G. Minervin, S.V. Abramova, E.N. Bojarov, A.S. Lomov. – Juzhno-Sahalinsk: izd-vo SahGU. 152 p. (In Russian).
6. Emel'janova T.V. (2020) Praktiko-orientirovannoe obuchenie budushhih pedagogov: zarubezhnyj opyt // Mezhdunarodnyj nauchno-issledovatel'skij zhurnal. Vypusk No. 9(99). Chast' 2. P. 110–116. (In Russian).
7. Prikaz Ministra prosveshhenija Respubliki Kazahstan ot 3 avgusta 2022 goda № 348 «Ob utverzhdenii gosudarstvennyh obshheobjazatel'nyh standartov doshkol'nogo vospitanija i obuchenija, nachal'nogo, osnovnogo srednego i obshhego srednego, tehnicheskogo i professional'nogo poslesrednego obrazovanija». (In Russian).
8. «Koncepcija modernizacii pedagogicheskogo obrazovanija Respubliki Kazahstan» ot 08 dekabrja 2022 g. (In Russian).
9. Gosudarstvennaja programma razvitija obrazovanija i nauki Respubliki Kazahstan na 2020–2025 gody. (In Russian).
10. Wondie A., Yigzaw N., Worku S. Effectiveness and Key Success Factors for Implementation of Problem-Based Learning in Debre Tabor University: A Mixed Methods Study // Ethiop J Health Sci. 2020, no. 30(5), pp. 803–816. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v30i5.21. (In English).
11. Edwards S., Brown C. (2020) Close-to-practice research: the need for student voice and the strange case of Academy x’ // London Review of Education, no. 18(3), pp. 480–94. URL: https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.18.3.11. (In English).
12. Dmitrenko T.A. (2009) Professional'no-orientirovannye tehnologii obuchenija inostrannym jazykam. Monografija. M.: «Prometej», 50 p. (In Russian).
13. Kobernyk O., Kolomiiets N., Komar O., Roienko L., Baidiuk L. (2022) Project Method Efficiency for the Teachers’ Professional Activities // Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, no. 11, pp. 73–86. doi:10.5430/jct.v11n1p73. (In English). (In Russian).
14. Bondar G. (2021) The role of project activities in the formation of foreign language professional competence of non-language freelance students. Collection of scientific works // Psychological and pedagogical problems of modern school, no. 1(5), pp. 118–125. URL: https://doi.org/10.31499/2706-6258.1(5).2021.235213/ (In English).
15. Elagina V.S., Pohlebaev S.M. (2012) Kompetentnostnyj podhod k organizacii obuchenija studentov v pedagogicheskom vuze // Fundamental'nye issledovanija. No. 3(3). P. 571–575. URL: https://fundamentalresearch.ru/ru/article/view?id=29758 (data obrashhenija: 12.07.2022)/ (In Russian).
16. Krjucheva Ja.V., Gavriljuk N.P. (2016) Dejatel'nostnyj i kompetentnostnyj podhody v obrazovanii: uspeshnost' v integracii // Professional'noe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire. 6(3). P. 421–427. (In Russian).
17. Kulkarni S., Patil S., Pawar R. (2020) Adoption of the Conceive-Design-Implement-Operate approach to the Third Year Project in a team-based design-build environment // Procedia Computer Science, pp. 559–567. DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.068. (In English).
18. Ramesh Babu A., Arulanand N., Satish Chandran V. (2020) Skill Development through Experiential Learning – A Case Study for Product Development Scenario // Procedia Computer Science, no. 172, pp. 16–21. (In English).
19. Dempsey H.L. (2007) Keller’s Personalized System of Instruction: Was it a fleeting fancy or is there a revival on the horizon? // The Behavior Analyst Today, no. 8(3), pp. 317–324, DOI:10.1037/h0100623. (In English).
20. Programma strategicheskogo razvitija NAO VKTU na 2023–2025 gody. (In Russian).
21. Baskoro G. (2020) Designing a Master Program to Cope with the New and Next Normal (VUCA World, Industry 4.0, and Covid 19): a case study // International Conf. on Management of Technology, Innovation, and Project (MOTIP), pp. 54–57. (In English).
Review
For citations:
Rakhmetullina S.Zh., Konurbayeva Zh.T., Surova D.S. Practice-oriented education as a response to the challenges of modern world. Bulletin of "Turan" University. 2023;(3):415-427. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46914/1562-2959-2023-1-3-415-427