Eco-foresight research in shaping country’s science development strategy regarding the green economy
https://doi.org/10.46914/1562-2959-2024-1-1-9-22
Abstract
This article focuses on the importance of eco- foresight research in shaping the country’s science development strategy in the field of green economy. The transition to a green economy requires balancing economic growth with environmental conservation, and finding a balanced model is a complex task that many specialists are actively working on. Ecoforesight, which involves the use of foresight methodology in the environmental field, plays a crucial role in identifying potential opportunities and risks for the natural environment associated with landmark innovations and global economic trends. The study aims to assess the long-term environmental impacts of current industrial activities and strategic planning of national industrial policies regarding green technologies. Scenario modeling, especially in the field of green technologies, is an important aspect of environmental forecasting due to its long-time horizons and numerous uncertainties. The article emphasizes the importance of eco- foresight research in ensuring sustainable development and innovation in the context of global strategic trends.
About the Authors
S. AzatKazakhstan
PhD, associate professor.
Almaty
A. Dzhumadil'daev
Kazakhstan
D.ph.-m.s., academician of the NAS RK, professor.
Almaty
Sh. M. Kobdikova
Kazakhstan
D.t.s., professor.
Almaty
References
1. Sutherland W., Broad S., Butchart S. (2018) A Horizon Scan of Emerging Issues for Global Conservation in 2019 // Trends in Ecology & Evolution. Vol. 34. Iss.1. P. 1–12. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.tree.2018.11.001. (In English).
2. Nakicenovic N., McGlade J., Ma S. (2005) Lessons learned for scenario analysis // Ecosystems and human well-being. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA. Vol. 2. P. 449–467. (In English).
3. Norgaard R. (1989) The case for methodological pluralism // Ecological Economics. Vol. 1. Iss. 1. P. 37–57. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(89)90023-2. (In English).
4. Sutherland W., Broad S., Butchart S. (2018) A Horizon Scan of Emerging Issues for Global Conservation in 2019 // Trends in Ecology & Evolution. Vol. 34. Iss. 1. P. 1–12. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.tree.2018.11.001. (In English).
5. Sutherland W., Clout M., Côté I. (2009) A horizon scan of global conservation issues for 2010 // Trends in Ecology and Evolution. Vol. 25. Iss. 1. P. 1–7. URL: https: //doi.org/10.1016/J.tree.2009.10.003. (In English).
6. Zanizdra M.Ju. Metody i praktika primenenija jekologicheskogo forsajta: analiticheskij obzor. URL: http://doi.org/10.15407/econindustry 2020.02.093 (data obrashhenija: 23.08.2023). (In Russian).
7. Kan'in K. Forsajt nauki, tehnologij i innovacij v Brazilii. URL: https://www.elibrary.az/docs/jurnal/jrn2014_576.pdf. (data obrashhenija: 23.08.2023). (In Russian).
8. Bennett E., Peterson G., Levitt E. (2005) Looking to the future of ecosystem services // Ecosystems. No. 8. P. 125–132. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10021-004-0078-y. (In English).
9. Cachia R., Compano R., Da Costa O. (2007) Grasping the potential of online social networks for foresight // Technological Forecasting & Social Change. No. 74(8). P. 1179–1203. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2007.05.006. (In English).
10. Bishop P., Hines A., Collins T. (2007) The current state of scenario development: an overview of techniques // Foresight. No. 9(1). P. 5–25. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14636680710727516ю (In English).
11. Bradfield R., Wright G., Burt G. (2005) The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning // Futures. No. 37(8). P. 795–812. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2005.01.003. (In English).
12. Brotherton R. (2015) The Brain Has a Blind Spot for ‘Unknown Unknowns’ // Discover Magazine. Kalmbach Publishing Company. URL: http://blogs.discover magazine.com/crux/2015/11/17/brain-unknowns/#.VmFaYISKFFK (eccessed: 23.08.2023). (In English).
13. Carpenter S., Bennett E., Peterson G. (2006) Scenarios for ecosystem services: an overview // Ecology and Society. Vol. 11. P. 29. (In English).
14. Gidley J., Fien J., Smith J. (2009) Participatory futures methods: towards adaptability and resilience in climate-vulnerable communities // Environmental Policy and Governance. No. 19(6). P. 427–440. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.524. (In English).
15. Cook C., Inayatullah S., Burgman M., Sutherland W., Wintle B. (2014) Strategic foresight: How planning for the unpredictable can improve environmental decision-making // Trends in Ecology & Evolution. No. 29(9). P. 531–541. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.07.005. (In English).
16. Elgin D., MacMichael D., Schwartz P. Alternative futures for environmental policy planning: 1975–2000 // EPA-540/9-75-027. Stanford Research Institute, Center for the Study of Social Policy for EPA. Washington, USA. European Commission. 2015. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/research/index.cfm?pg=foresight (eccessed: 23.08.2023). (In English).
17. European Commission. Science for Environment Policy. Future brief: Identifying emerging risks for environmental policies // European Commission. 2016. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/integration/research/newsalert/pdf/emerging_environmental_risks_early_warnings_FB12_en.pdf (eccessed: 23.08.2023). (In English).
18. Evans K., De Jong W., Cronkleton P., Nghi T. Participatory methods for planning the future in forest communities // Society and Natural Resources. 2010. Vol. 23. Iss. 10. P. 604–619. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920802713572. (In English).
19. Gordon T. (2007) Energy forecasts using a “roundless” approach to running a Delphi study // Foresight. No. 9(2). P. 27–35. URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680710737731. (In English).
20. Leigh A. (2003) Thinking ahead: Strategic foresight and government // Australian Journal of Public Administration. Vol. 62. Iss. 2. P. 3–10. URL: https://doi.org/l0.1111/1467-8497.00320. (In English).
21. Foresight and anticipatory governance in practice. OECD 2021. URL: www.oecd.org/strategic-foresight/foresight@oecd.org. (eccessed: 23.11.2023). (In English).
22. Leitch J., Leistritz F. (1984) Delphi analysis: a technique for identifying and ranking environmental and natural resource policy issues // Environmental Professional. Vol. 6. Iss. 1. P. 32–40. (In English).
23. The 11th Science and Technology Foresight Scenario Planning from the Viewpoint of Globalization // Summary Report – NISTEP REPORT. 2023. No. 183. (eccessed: 23.08.2023). (In English).
24. Kim M. Lichnyj blog. URL: https://www.nauka.kz/page.php (data obrashhenija: 23.08.2023). (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Azat S., Dzhumadil'daev A., Kobdikova Sh.M. Eco-foresight research in shaping country’s science development strategy regarding the green economy. Bulletin of "Turan" University. 2024;(1):9-22. https://doi.org/10.46914/1562-2959-2024-1-1-9-22