The impact of digital transfmation on labor productivity: international experience

This study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the impact of digital transformation on labor productivity in industrial enterprises. In the context of globalization and technological progress, the digitalization of industrial production has become a crucial factor in economic growth. Digital technologies–automation, artificial intelligence, big data analytics, cloud computing, and the industrial Internet of Things (IoT) are key tools for improving labor productivity. These technologies not only enhance production efficiency but also strengthen the competitiveness of enterprises, expanding their opportunities to enter global markets. The study examines international experiences in assessing the impact of digital transformation on labor productivity. Reforms implemented under Germany's "Industry 4.0" initiative, South Korea's digital strategies, and Singapore's "Smart City" program are analyzed, highlighting their effects on the industrial sector. In these countries, the adoption of digital technologies is considered a critical factor in increasing labor productivity. Additionally, the research explores the current state of digital transformation in Kazakhstan's industrial enterprises, identifying key barriers and opportunities. The main challenges of industrial digitalization in Kazakhstan are related to infrastructure limitations, a shortage of qualified personnel, and the low readiness of enterprises to adopt new technologies. Addressing these issues requires enhanced government support, the development of digital infrastructure, and the strengthening of enterprises' innovation potential. The findings of this study indicate that the effective implementation of digital transformation in Kazakhstan will become a vital component of national innovation development, positively impacting labor productivity and sustainable economic growth. The widespread adoption of digital technologies will enable industrial enterprises to optimize production processes, expand into new markets, and improve their competitiveness.

1. OECD. Digital Economy Outlook: Digital Transformation and Productivity // OECD Digital Economy Report. 2022. Chapter 3. P. 45–67. URL: https://www.oecd.org/digital/digital-economy-outlook (өtіnіsh berіlgen kүn: 23.02.2025). (In English).

2. McKinsey Global Institute. Impact of Digital Transformation on Labor Productivity // Digital Transformation Report. 2022. Section 2.1. P. 23–35. URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/mckinsey-digital/our-insights (өtіnіsh berіlgen kүn: 23.02.2025). (In English).

3. World Economic Forum. Digital Economy and Global Productivity // World Economic Forum Report. 2023. Chapter 4. P. 50–63. URL: https://www.weforum.org/reports (өtіnіsh berіlgen kүn: 23.02.2025). (In English).

4. Sifrlyq Qazaqstan memlekettık bağdarlamasy. Sifrlyq ekonomika negızderı // Memlekettık bağdarlama. 2018. 2.1 bölım. P. 15–27. URL: https://digitalkz.kz (ötınış berılgen kün: 23.02.2025). (In Kazakh).

5. IMD. Digital Talent and Technology Adoption // Global Digital Competitiveness Report. 2023. Section 2. P. 30–48. URL: https://www.imd.org/centers/world-competitiveness-center/rankings/digital-competitiveness (өtіnіsh berіlgen kүn: 23.02.2025). (In English).

6. European Commission. The Role of Digital Infrastructure in Productivity // Digital Transformation Study. 2021. Chapter 5. P. 60–75. URL: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/digital-transformation (өtіnіsh berіlgen kүn: 23.02.2025). (In English).

7. United Nations. E-Government for Economic Efficiency // E-Government Development Index. 2022. Chapter 3. P. 40–55. URL: https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-GovernmentSurvey-2022 (өtіnіsh berіlgen kүn: 23.02.2025). (In English).

8. Digital Kazakhstan. Cifrlandyrudyң eңbek өnіmdіlіgіne әserі // Kazakhstan Digital Transformation Strategy 2030. 4.2 bөlіm. P. 35–50. URL: https://digitalkz.kz/strategy2030 (өtіnіsh berіlgen kүn: 23.02.2025). (In English).

9. Türkeeva K.A., Ūmarova G.H. Joğary tehnologialardyñ älemdık naryğy: erekşelıkterı men damu bolaşağy // Ekonomika: strategia jäne praktika. 2020. No. 2(15). P. 121–131. (In Kazakh).

10. Qazaqstannyñ elektrondyq ükımetı jäne innovasialyq memlekettık qyzmetter // Memlekettık basqaru jüiesı. 2022. No. 6. P. 6. (In Kazakh).

11. Qazaqstan Respublikasy Ükımetınıñ “Sifrlyq Qazaqstan” memlekettık bağdarlamasyn bekıtu turaly qaulysy // Ükımet qaulysy. 2017. No. 827. P. 12–18. (In Kazakh).

12. Brynjolfsson E., Saunders A. (2023) Digital transformation and productivity growth: Evidence from global firms // Management Science. Vol. 69(3). P. 1543–1568. (In English).

13. Li K., Kim D.J., Lang K.R. (2023) How digital transformation drives labor productivity: A crosscountry analysis // Information Systems Research. Vol. 34(1). P. 238–259. (In English).

14. Gal P., Nicoletti G., von Rüden C. (2022) Digital transformation and productivity gains: A review of the evidence across countries // OECD Productivity Working Papers. Vol. 45(2). P. 78–95. (In English).

15. Wang Y., Chen H. (2023) Digital transformation in manufacturing: Impact on labor productivity and skill requirements // Industrial Marketing Management. Vol. 108(4). P. 507–521. (In English).

16. Kumar S., Rajan R. (2022) The impact of digital technologies on workforce productivity: Evidence from emerging economies // Journal of International Business Studies. Vol. 53(6). P. 1075–1095. (In English).

17. Martinez-Caro E., Cegarra-Navarro J.G. (2023) Digital transformation success factors and their influence on organizational productivity // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol. 186(5). P. 121–133. (In English).