Assessment of the development of agricultural cooperatives in the regions of Kazakhstan and their impact on the living standards of rural residents

Agricultural cooperatives (ACs) play a key role in increasing rural incomes, creating jobs, and reducing farmers’ costs. This article aims to scientifically identify the most favorable regions for AC development in Kazakhstan by considering regional characteristics and the share of rural population, and to assess their impact on rural quality of life. To achieve this, several research tasks were carried out: a comparative analysis of the rural population share across Kazakhstan’s regions; within the framework of the maximum and minimum level methods, a dynamic analysis of the development of agricultural cooperatives (ACs) was conducted, and regions with the highest potential for further development were identified. The study focused on the following regions: Zhambyl, Kyzylorda, Mangystau, Atyrau, Akmola, North Kazakhstan, and East Kazakhstan oblasts. Based on the economic indicators of ACs, key parameters that may influence the income levels and quality of life of rural populations in these regions were scientifically substantiated. A multifactor correlation-regression analysis was used to determine the factors influencing rural population decline. The study covers the period from 2017 to 2023. It examines the relationship between population size, indicators of quality of life, and economic indicators related to ACs. Findings show that in regions with a growing number of cooperatives, the connection between AC development and rural quality of life remains weak. However, in regions that are major agricultural producers, this relationship is significantly stronger. Therefore, government bodies should clearly communicate the benefits of ACs to farmers, support the development of marketing, advisory, and technical service cooperatives, ensure access to land resources, and take into account regional specifics and the rural population share. Special attention should be given to the socio-economic impact of ACs on rural communities

1. Año Internacional de las Cooperativas de la ONU 2025. 2025. URL: https://ica.coop/es/ano-internacionalcooperativas-onu-2025 (accessed: 16.04.2025). (In Englich).

2. General Assembly. 2024. International Year of Cooperatives 2025. URL: https://2025.coop/iyc/ (accessed: 16.04.2025). (In English).

3. Contribution of the Cooperatives in Agricultural Sector to the Sustainable Development Goals. International Labour Organization. 2020. URL: file:///C:/Users/w2/Downloads/Report_on_agricoops_contribution_to_SDGs%20(1).pdf (accessed: 18.04.2025). (In English).

4. Zhu X., Wang G. (2024) Impact of Agricultural Cooperatives on Farmers’ Collective Action: A Study Based on the Socio-Ecological System Framework // Agriculture. Vol. 14(1). No. 96. Р. 1–17. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/ agriculture14010096. (In English).

5. Zakon RK «O sel'skohozjajstvennyh kooperativah» ot 29 oktjabrja 2015 goda, No. 372-V ZRK. URL: //https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/Z1500000372 (data obrashhenija: 25.04.2025). (In Russian).

6. Koncepcija razvitija sel'skih territorij Respubliki Kazahstan na 2023–2027 gody, 28 marta 2023 goda. No. 270. URL: //https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/P2300000270 (data obrashhenija: 26.04.2025). (In Russian).

7. Koncepcija razvitija agropromyshlennogo kompleksa Respubliki Kazahstan na 2021–2030 gody, 30 dekabrja 2021 goda. No. 960. URL: //https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/P2100000960 (data obrashhenija: 28.04.2025). (In Russian).

8. Kompleksnyj plan po razvitiju pererabotki sel'skohozjajstvennoj produkcii na 2024–2028 gody, 28 ijunja 2024 goda. No. 512. URL: //https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/P2400000512 (data obrashhenija: 28.04.2025). (In Russian).

9. Pravitel'stvo priznalo nejeffektivnost' programmy sel'hozkooperacii. Eldala.kz. 07 avgusta 2024. URL: https://eldala.kz/novosti/kazahstan/19875-pravitelstvo-priznalo-neeffektivnost-programmy-selhozkooperacii?utm_source=chatgpt.com (data obrashhenija: 03.05.2025). (In Russian).

10. Lipatova N.N., Mamai O.V., Mamai I.N., Gazizyanova Y.Y., Galenko N.N. (2021) Agricultural cooperation as a factor in sustainable rural development // IOP Conference Series: Earth & Environmental Science. No. 745. 012018. P. 1–7. URL: DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/745/1/012018. (In English).

11. Siregar A.P., O’Donoghue C., Whay B. (2024) Agricultural Co-operatives in Four Asian Countries: A Review of Institutional History // Reviews in Agricultural Science. Vol. 12. P. 24–44. URL: https://doi.org/10.7831/ras.12.0_24: https://doi.org/10.7831/ras.12.0_24. (In English).

12. Porter G., Phillips-Howard K. (1997) Comparing contracts: An evaluation of contract farming schemes in Africa // World Development. Vol. 25. No. 2. P. 227–238. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(96)00101-5. (In English).

13. ОECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2023–2032. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2023. URL: https://www.fao.org/3/-cc6361en/cc6361en.pdf (accessed: 19.05.2025). (In English).

14. Qazaqstan Respublikasy Strategialyq josparlau jäne reformalar agenttıgı Ūlttyq statistika bürosynyñ resmi saity. 2017–2023 jj. URL: //https://stat.gov.kz (ötınış berılgen kün: 21.05.2025). (In Kazakh).

15. Wati R., Tan F., Games D., Ridwan E. (2023) SMEs Strategies to Improve the Competitiveness of Dairy Products in West Sumatra Province // American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences. Vol. 18. No. 2. P. 139–146. URL: https://doi.org/10.3844/ajavsp.2023.139.146. (In English).

16. Kabzhaljalova M., Kaldarov S., Ahmed'jarova A. (2024) Pochemu sel'skohozjajstvennye kooperativy ne rasprostraneny v Kazahstane? // 2024 AO «Halyk Finance», 8 avgusta. URL: https://halykfinance.kz/download/files/analytics/ac_agrico.pdf (data obrashhenija: 28.05.2025). (In Russian).

17. Udincova N.M., Kopteva N.A., Seredina M.N., Serjogina V.V. (2019) Jekonomiko-matemamaticheskie metody i modelirovanie: uchebnoe posobie. – Zernograd: Azovo-Chernomorskij inzhenernyj institut FGBOU VO Donskoj GAU. 149 p. (In Russian).