Preview

Bulletin of "Turan" University

Advanced search

Assessment and measurability of circular economy indicators in the agro-industrial complex of Kazakhstan: foreign experience and methodological approaches

https://doi.org/10.46914/1562-2959-2026-1-1-315-328

Abstract

In the context of the transformation of the agro-industrial complex of the Republic of Kazakhstan towards sustainable development, the development of a system of quantitatively measurable circular economy indicators is becoming increasingly important. The lack of unified methodological approaches to assessing circularity in agricultural production limits monitoring capabilities, interregional comparability and the justification of management decisions. The purpose of this article is to analyze international methodological approaches to circular economy assessment and to develop an adapted toolkit for measuring circular processes in the agro-industrial complex of Kazakhstan. The study applies methods of system analysis, comparative review, index modeling and expert assessment. International indicator frameworks are examined, including the approaches of the European Commission, the Ellen MacArthur Foundation and BEROC, as well as KPI-based methods for assessing business circularity. Based on international experience and the results of the author’s calculations for agricultural enterprises in the northern regions of Kazakhstan, an integrated system of indicators is proposed that reflects the economic, environmental and social effects of closed production cycles. The integration of circular economy principles with digital and lean management tools is considered an important factor in improving the sustainability and competitiveness of agricultural production. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the development of an aggregated circularity index for the agro-industrial complex, adapted to the biological and seasonal characteristics of agriculture in Kazakhstan and based on the integration of LCA and ESG assessment methods. The practical significance of the results is determined by their applicability in agrarian policy design, sectoral program development and circular economy monitoring.

About the Authors

G. T. Кunafina
S. Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical Research University
Kazakhstan

c.e.s., associate professor 

Astana 



N. N. Nurmukhametov
Kyzylorda Open University
Kazakhstan

c.e.s., professor 

Kyzylorda 



A. N. Issakhmetova
Central Asian Innovation University
Kazakhstan

c.e.s., associate professor 

Shymkent 



Z. S. Mukhambetova
S. Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical Research University
Kazakhstan

c.e.s., associate professor 

Astana 



References

1. Geissdoerfer M., Savaget P., Bocken N.M.P. (2017) The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm? // Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 143, pp. 757–768. (In English).

2. Murray A., Skene K., Haynes K. (2017) The Circular Economy: An interdisciplinary exploration // Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 26(3), pp. 369–380. (In English).

3. Blomsma F., Brennan G. (2017) The emergence of circular economy // Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 21(3), pp. 603–614. (In English).

4. Kirchherr J., Reike D., Hekkert M. (2017) Conceptualizing the circular economy // Resources, Conservation & Recycling, vol. 127, pp. 221–232. (In English).

5. Bocken N.M.P., Short S., Rana P., Evans S. (2016) A literature review on circular economy // Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 20(3), pp. 542–558. (In English).

6. OECD. Business Models for the Circular Economy. Paris, 2019. (In English).

7. Geng Y., Sarkis J. (2019) Measuring circular economy performance // Resources, Conservation & Recycling, vol. 143, pp. 153–155. (In English).

8. Saidani M., Yannou B., Leroy Y., Cluzel F. (2019) A taxonomy of circular economy indicators // Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 207, pp. 542–559. (In English).

9. World Bank. Sustainable Agriculture and Circular Economy. Washington, 2021. (In English).

10. FAO. Circular Economy in Agriculture. Rome, 2020. (In English).

11. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Circularity Indicators. 2015. URL: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/material-circularity-indicator (accessed: 15.01.2025). (In English).

12. European Commission. Monitoring framework for the circular economy. - Brussels, 2020. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/circular-economy/monitoring-framework (accessed: 15.01.2025). (In English).

13. Eurostat. Circular economy indicators. Luxembourg, 2023. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/circular-economy (accessed: 15.01.2025). (In English).

14. Linder M., Sarasini S., van Loon P. (2017) A metric for quantifying product-level circularity // Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 21(3), pp. 545–558. (In English).

15. Korhonen J., Honkasalo A., Seppälä J. (2018) Circular economy: The concept and its limitations // Ecological Economics. Vol. 143, pp. 37–46. (In English).

16. BEROC. Circular Economy in Transition Economies. Minsk, 2021. (In English).

17. Agentstvo po strategicheskomu planirovaniju i reformam RK. Indikatory ustojchivogo razvitija. Astana, 2022. (In Russian).

18. Ministerstvo sel’skogo hozjajstva Respubliki Kazahstan. Gosudarstvennaja programma razvitija APK. Astana, 2023. (In Russian).

19. UNEP. Measuring circular economy. Nairobi, 2020. (In English).


Review

For citations:


Кunafina G.T., Nurmukhametov N.N., Issakhmetova A.N., Mukhambetova Z.S. Assessment and measurability of circular economy indicators in the agro-industrial complex of Kazakhstan: foreign experience and methodological approaches. Bulletin of "Turan" University. 2026;(1):315-328. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46914/1562-2959-2026-1-1-315-328

Views: 34

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1562-2959 (Print)
ISSN 2959-1236 (Online)