Modern approaches to accounting and analytical support for budgeting business processes in the agroindustrial complex

In the context of digitalization of the economy and increasing requirements for the efficiency of management of enterprises of the agro-industrial complex (AIC), the importance of improving the accounting and analytical support of business processes has increased. Proper formation of the budgeting information base allows you to increase the validity of management decisions, the efficiency of resource allocation, and reduce risks. The purpose of the study is to systematize and develop the theoretical and methodological foundations of the accounting and analytical support of business processes in the agro-industrial complex, taking into account modern digital tools and management accounting standards. In the course of the study, the methods of systematic and comparative analysis, structural and logical modeling, as well as economic and mathematical analysis were used to assess the impact of accounting and analytical tools on budgeting performance indicators. The methodological basis of the study is based on the concepts of management accounting, digitalization of financial processes, and analysis. The uniqueness of the study lies in defining the concept of accounting and analytical support for budgeting and making comprehensive recommendations for its development, taking into account the specifics of the agro-industrial complex of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The results of the study demonstrate the impact of integrating accounting and analytical data into the management budgeting system on increasing the transparency, efficiency and accuracy of management decisions. The developed model demonstrates that the connection between the strategic goals of the organization, financial indicators and operational plans increases the stability of agro-industrial enterprises and the efficiency of resource use.

1. Shalgin V. (2024) Classification of budget risks in the context of digital transformation of the budget process: institutional and structural approach // Ekonomika i Upravlenie: Problemy Resheniya. Vol. 12. No. 26(153). P. 84–91. https://doi.org/10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2024.12.26.012 (In English)

2. Gardas B., Raut R., Jagtap A., Narkhede B. (2019) Exploring the key performance indicators of green supply chain management in agro-industry // Journal of Modelling in Management. Vol. 14. No. 1. P. 260–283. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-12-2017-0139 (In English)

3. Kononenko R., Solovyeva L., Tedeeva R., Tokar E. (2022) Updating the assessment of company performance through the use of economic and mathematical methods // Regionalnaya Ekonomika Yug Rossii. No. 2. P. 152–165. https://doi.org/10.15688/re.volsu.2022.2.15 (In English)

4. Rusyn-Hrynyk R., Fedorchak O., Kotsaba P. (2025) Conceptual approaches to the formation of an adaptive-prognostic paradigm of enterprise financial management // Eastern Europe: Economy, Business and Management. No. 2(47). https://doi.org/10.32782/easterneurope.47-6 (In English)

5. Khoruzhy L.I., Katkov Y.N., Romanova A.A., Katkova E.A., Dzhikiya M.K. (2022) Adaptive management reporting system in inter-organizational relations of agricultural enterprises according to ESG principles // Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development. Vol. 6. No. 2. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v6i2.1649 (In English)

6. Nie J., Wang Y., Li Y., Chao X. (2022) Artificial intelligence and digital twins in sustainable agriculture and forestry: a survey // Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. Vol. 4. No. 5. Article 5. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-011X.3033 (In English)

7. Lin W. et al. (2020) Blockchain technology in current agricultural systems // IEEE Access. Vol. 8. P. 143920–143937. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3014522 (In English)

8. Boranbay S.S., Juchnevicius E. (2024) The concept of a smart contract: advantages and current situation of legal regulation in the Republic of Kazakhstan // Bulletin of Karaganda University. Law Series. No. 3. P. 100–112. https://doi.org/10.31489/2024l3/100-112 (In English)

9. Abd N.S. (2023) The role of the activity-based budgeting approach in preparing planning budgets and costs control: an applied study in SDI Company // American Journal of Economics and Business Management. Vol. 6. No. 9. P. 48–60. https://doi.org/10.31150/ajebm.v6i9.2429 (In English)

10. Nukesheva A.Zh., Kudryashova E.V. (2020) State support for agribusiness in Germany: sociodemographic aspect // Problems of AgriMarket. No. 4. P. 155–162. https://doi.org/10.46666/2020-4-2708-9991.19 (In English)

11. Majumder R.Q. (2025) The role of forecasting and budgeting data accuracy in improving organizational performance. Chattogram: Daffodil Institute of IT. P. 4963–4976. (In English)

12. Qiu J., Deng X., Liang R. (2024) Can enterprise intelligent transformation promote accounting information transparency? Pressure from media attention // Finance Research Letters. Vol. 66. Article 105605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105605 (In English)

13. Tiwari C.K., Bhat M.A., Alshabibi B., Al Balushi Z.S., Pal A. (2025) Mapping four decades of research on sustainability accounting, sustainable finance, and governance: a bibliometric analysis and future directions // Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting. Vol. ahead-of-print, № ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-04-2025-0274 (In English)

14. Qazaqstan Respublikasy Sifrlyq damu, innovasialar jäne aeroğaryş önerkäsıbı ministrınıñ 2025 jylğy 24 säuırdegı № 179/NQ būiryğy «Qazaqstan Respublikasy Sifrlyq damu, innovasialar jäne aeroğaryş önerkäsıbı ministrlıgınıñ 2023–2027 jyldarğa arnalğan damu josparynyñ nysanaly indikatorlary men nätijeler körsetkışterın esepteu ädıstemesın bekıtu turaly» būiryqqa özgerıs engızu turaly. (In Kazakh)

15. Kerimova U.K., Zhao P. (2025) Soltüstık Qazaqstan öñırınıñ agrarlyq sektoryndağy äleumettıkekologialyq-ekonomikalyq jüielerdıñ tūraqty damuy // Problemy agrorynka. No. 2. Р. 14–23. https://doi.org/10.46666/2025-2.2708-9991.01 (In Kazakh)

16. Koşerbek A.A., Saparova G.K., Achilov M.U. (2025) Qazaqstannyñ agrarlyq sektoryndağy käsıpkerlık: basqaru strategiasy // Problemy agrorynka. No. 2. Р. 82–93. https://doi.org/10.46666/2025-2.2708-9991.07 (In Kazakh)

17. Datar S.M., Rajan M.V. (2021) Horngren’s Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis. 17th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education. 1024 p. (In English)

18. Drury C. (2018) Management and Cost Accounting. 10th ed. Andover: Cengage Learning. 842 p. (In English)

19. Kaplan R.S., Cooper R. (1998) Cost and Effect: Using Integrated Cost Systems to Drive Profitability and Performance. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. 357 p. (In English)

20. Hope J., Fraser R. (2003) Beyond Budgeting: How Managers Can Break Free from the Annual Performance Trap. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. 232 p. (In English)

21. Davenport T.H. (1993) Process Innovation: Reengineering Work through Information Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. 337 p. (In English)

22. Gunasekaran A., Patel C., McGaughey R.E. (2004) A framework for supply chain performance measurement // International Journal of Production Economics. Vol. 87. No. 3. P. 333–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.08.003 (In English).