An integrated multi-criteria framework for assessing enterprise competitiveness
https://doi.org/10.46914/1562-2959-2026-1-2-644-658
Abstract
The study proposes an integrated analytical framework for assessing the competitiveness of service enterprises based on multi-criteria evaluation, inflation-adjusted price analysis, and time-series forecasting. To account for price dynamics, inflation data for 2012–2025 were used to calculate cumulative inflation coefficients and reconstruct historical price trends. Competitiveness was assessed using an integral indicator that aggregates price and non-price factors, including pricing policy, range and quality of services, discount systems, frequency of visits, and brand image, enabling an objective comparison of enterprises. Revenue forecasting for 2026–2030 was performed using the ARIMA model, allowing the identification of medium-term development trends under changing market conditions. The results demonstrate that low pricing represents only a short-term competitive advantage, while sustainable market leadership is achieved through the balanced development of multiple competitiveness parameters. Unlike traditional descriptive competitiveness assessments, the proposed approach includes a formalized optimization component that identifies the combination of managerial parameters maximizing the enterprise competitiveness index under economic and operational constraints. The study’s practical significance lies in developing a versatile competitiveness index, adaptable across industries, to guide strategic planning, optimize resources, strengthen market positions, and enhance investment attractiveness.
About the Authors
L. I. SorokinaKazakhstan
c.e.s., associate professor
Ust-Kamenogorsk
A. A. Ismukhamedov
Kazakhstan
doctoral student
Ust-Kamenogorsk
Ye. V. Varavin
Kazakhstan
c.e.s., associate professor
Ust-Kamenogorsk
B. Zirkler
Germany
PhD, professor
Zwickau
References
1. Siudek T., Zawojska A. Competitiveness in the economic concepts, theories and empirical research // Oeconomia. 2014. Vol. 13. No. 1. P. 91–108.
2. Reva Y.N. et al. The impact of quality and price on purchase decisions mediated by customer satisfaction // Journal of Business and Applied Management. 2024. Vol. XVII. No. 2. P. 161–184.
3. Vlados C.M., Katimertzopoulos F. Assessing meso and micro-competitiveness boosting policies in Stra. Tech.Man terms // International Journal of Business and Social Research. 2018. Vol. 8. No. 9. P. 1–15.
4. Shaulska L. et al. Strategic enterprise competitiveness management under global challenges // Academy of Strategic Management Journal. 2021. Vol. 20. No. 4. P. 1–7.
5. Meier A., Eller R., Peters M. Creating competitiveness in incumbent smalland medium-sized enterprises: a revised perspective on digital transformation // Journal of Business Research. 2025. Vol. 186. P. 115028.
6. Comanescu E.L. et al. Competitiveness of companies in the competitive environment: the essential question of performance management // Proceedings of the International Conference Knowledge-based organization. 2018. Vol. 24. No. 1. P. 273–278.
7. Dukhaykh S., Alangri N. Dynamic capabilities and sustainable competitive advantage in SMEs: the roles of innovation and organizational learning // Industrial Digital Transformation: Sustainable Challenges for SMEs. 2026. Vol. 18. No. 3. P. 1320.
8. Ozcalici M. et al. Strategizing competitive edge in service operations: a model proposal for determining the unit costs through activity-based cost accounting and the full-consistency method // Operations Management Research. 2024. Vol. 17. P. 996–1021.
9. Azhar N.A. et al. Multi-criteria decision making: a systematic review // Recent Advances in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. 2021. Vol. 14. No. 8. P. 23.
10. Lamrini L., Abounaima M.C., Alaoui M.T. New distributed-TOPSIS approach for multi-criteria decision-making problems in a big data context // Journal of Big Data. 2023. Vol. 10. No. 97.
11. Gligor D., Jurcu C.-N. About competitiveness in the context of sustainable development // Proceedings of the 8th International Management Conference “Management Challenges for Sustainable Development”. Bucharest, 2014. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 65–74.
12. Ivanova M. et al. Assessment of the competitiveness of enterprises // Economic Annals. 2018. Vol. 173. No. 9–10. P. 26–31.
13. Zou J. et al. Improved large-scale multi-objective competitive swarm optimizer with direction learning and decision enhancement // Expert Systems with Applications. 2026. Vol. 297. P. 129328.
14. Baths and saunas in Ust-Kamenogorsk. URL: https://101sauna.kz/Oskemen (accessed: 29.12.2025)
15. Baths in Ust-Kamenogorsk. URL: https://oskemen.bani.kz/ (accessed: 29.12.2025)
16. 2GIS: maps and directory. URL: https://2gis.kz (accessed: 29.12.2025)
17. Inflation in Kazakhstan from 2012 to 2025 // Statista. URL: https://www.statista.com/statistics/436183/inflation-rate-in-kazakhstan/ (accessed: 29.12.2025)
18. Hyndman R.J., Athanasopoulos G. Forecasting: principles and practice. 2018. P. 1–74.
19. Bairagi A. How do suppliers to FDI companies finance their business despite facing unique challenges? A case insight from Bangladesh’s SMEs sector // American Journal of Industrial and Business Management. 2025. Vol. 15. No. 5. P. 782–814.
Review
For citations:
Sorokina L.I., Ismukhamedov A.A., Varavin Ye.V., Zirkler B. An integrated multi-criteria framework for assessing enterprise competitiveness. Bulletin of "Turan" University. 2026;(2):644-658. https://doi.org/10.46914/1562-2959-2026-1-2-644-658
JATS XML















