Theory and conceptual models of project management in the public sector

This article analyzes the theoretical evolution and contemporary conceptual models of project management mechanisms in public institutions in the context of sustainable development. The relevance of this study lies in the fact that public sector projects are characterized by multi-level stakeholder participation, high levels of accountability and institutional constraints, and growing demands for sustainable development. The aim of this study is to systematize classical and contemporary theoretical approaches to project management, identify their specific features in the public sector context, and present an integrated conceptual model that incorporates sustainable development principles. The study utilized a theoretical and analytical approach, including a systematic literature review, bibliometric analysis, comparative analysis, and conceptual synthesis. Based on publications in Scopus and Web of Science databases, the position of project management governance and sustainability topics in academic discourse was analyzed. The study identified stages in the evolution of project management mechanisms and proposed a typology of project management in the public sector from a sustainable development perspective. Furthermore, a conceptual model was developed that integrates project management principles, institutional theory, and the “triple bottom line” concept. The study’s findings demonstrate the theoretical and practical importance of considering project management in public institutions as a management system that ensures public value and long-term sustainable development. The findings emphasize that project management in public organizations should be considered not only as a tool for regulating internal processes but also as a comprehensive governance system that enhances public value and ensures long-term sustainable development. This provides opportunities for strategic project planning, effective resource allocation, and achieving sustainable development goals.

1. Wirick D.W. Public-sector project management: meeting the challenges and achieving results. Hoboken: Wiley, 2009.

2. United Nations. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development (A/RES/70/1). New York: United Nations, 2015.

3. Silvius A.J.G., Schipper R.P.J. Sustainability in project management: a literature review and impact analysis // Social Business. 2014. Vol. 4. No. 1. P. 63–96. DOI: 10.1362/204440814X13948909253866.

4. Elkington J. Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone, 1997.

5. Project Management Institute. The standard for project management and a guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). 7th ed. Newtown Square: Project Management Institute, 2021.

6. Kerzner H. Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. 12th ed. Hoboken: Wiley, 2017.

7. Hood C.A public management for all seasons? // Public Administration. 1991. Vol. 69. No. 1. P. 3–19. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x.

8. Young R., Young M., Jordan E., O’Connor P. Is strategy being implemented through projects? Contrary evidence from a leader in new public management // International Journal of Project Management. 2012. Vol. 30. No. 8. P. 887–900. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.03.003.

9. Beck K., Beedle M., van Bennekum A., Cockburn A., Cunningham W., Fowler M., Grenning J., Highsmith J., Hunt A., Jeffries R., Kern J., Marick B., Martin R.C., Mellor S., Schwaber K., Sutherland J., Thomas D. Manifesto for agile software development. Agile Alliance, 2001.

10. Flyvbjerg B., Bruzelius N., Rothengatter W. Megaprojects and risk: an anatomy of ambition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

11. Too E.G., Weaver P. The management of project management: a conceptual framework for project governance // International Journal of Project Management. 2014. Vol. 32. No. 8. P. 1382–1394. DOI: 10.1016/j. ijproman.2013.07.006

12. Klakegg O.J. Governance frameworks for public project development and estimation // Project Management Journal. 2008. Vol. 39 (Suppl. 1). P. S27–S42. DOI: 10.1002/pmj.20058

13. Volden G.H., Andersen B. The hierarchy of public project governance frameworks: an empirical study of principles and practices in Norwegian ministries and agencies // International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. 2018. Vol. 11. No. 1. P. 174–197. DOI: 10.1108/IJMPB-04-2017-0040

14. DiMaggio P.J., Powell W.W. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields // American Sociological Review. 983. Vol. 48. No. 2. P. 147–160. DOI: 10.2307/2095101

15. Scott W.R. Institutions and organizations: ideas, interests, and identities. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 2014.

16. Huemann M., Silvius G. Projects to create the future: managing projects meets sustainable development // International Journal of Project Management. 2017. Vol. 35. No. 6. P. 1066–1070. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.014.

17. Freeman R.E. Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman, 1984.

18. Moore M.H. Creating public value: strategic management in government. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press, 1995.

19. Williams T., Klakegg O.J., Magnussen O.M., Glasspool H. An investigation of governance frameworks for public projects in Norway and the UK // International Journal of Project Management. 2010. Vol. 28. No. 1. P. 40–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.04.001