Complex approach for state anti-crisis management in a down economy
https://doi.org/10.46914/1562-2959-2020-1-4-19-26
Abstract
The article analyzes anti-crisis state economic measures, justifies the inadmissibility of “targeted anti-crisis measures”, practicality of long-term planning, which should become the foundation of complex approach to state anticrisis management amid the global financial crisis, Russian economic crisis, anti-Russian sanctions and the pandemic of Covid–19. As part of solving this problem – improving the quality of public administration – many scientists and practitioners have high hopes for the global digitalization of the economy, which provides for the introduction of adaptability to the challenges of the digital economy into the state mechanism. The authors focus on the low level of efficiency of interbudgetary relations, which indicates that one of the most important shortcomings of the mechanism used in Russia is the untimely allocation of budget allocations from the state budget-to-budget recipients, one of the unjustified reasons for which may be the conviction of government officials that budget spending stimulates inflation. As part of increasing the level of state anti-crisis management and regulation of personal responsibility of federal executive bodies, it seems expedient to propose the representatives of science13 to include the indicator of evenness of
budget execution in the list of criteria for assessing the quality of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation. In addition, the article investigates the negative consequences of VAT increase, the abolition of indexation of a working retired person’s pension, the establishment of market relations in the housing and communal services, realistic budget policy. The article pays particular attention to bankruptcy institution in Russia and its negative consequences, the need to increase the level of research and development commercialization in universities.
budget execution in the list of criteria for assessing the quality of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation. In addition, the article investigates the negative consequences of VAT increase, the abolition of indexation of a working retired person’s pension, the establishment of market relations in the housing and communal services, realistic budget policy. The article pays particular attention to bankruptcy institution in Russia and its negative consequences, the need to increase the level of research and development commercialization in universities.
About the Authors
A. N. Ryakhovskaya
Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Professor of Management Department, Leader of Scientific School “Anti-crisis Management” of Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation, President of Institute of Economics and Anti-crisis Management, Chairman of Anti-crisis Management and Distressed Credit Subcommittee of Committee on Business Security of Commercial and Industrial Chamber of Russian Federation, Member of Russia’s Federal Property Management Agency Council, d.e.s., professor
Russian Federation
Professor of Management Department, Leader of Scientific School “Anti-crisis Management” of Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation, President of Institute of Economics and Anti-crisis Management, Chairman of Anti-crisis Management and Distressed Credit Subcommittee of Committee on Business Security of Commercial and Industrial Chamber of Russian Federation, Member of Russia’s Federal Property Management Agency Council, d.e.s., professor
D. I. Ryakhovskiy
Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
d.e.s., head of “Taxes and Tax Management” Department of Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Rector of Institute of Economics and Anti-crisis Management, Professor of Department “Anti-crisis Management and Finance”, Professor of Department “Taxes and Tax Management” of Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Practicing Tax Consultant
Russian Federation
d.e.s., head of “Taxes and Tax Management” Department of Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Rector of Institute of Economics and Anti-crisis Management, Professor of Department “Anti-crisis Management and Finance”, Professor of Department “Taxes and Tax Management” of Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Practicing Tax Consultant
References
1. Kovan S.E. Teoriya antikrizisnogo upravleniya social'no-ekonomicheskimi sistemami (resursnyj podhod): monografiya. – M.: INFRA-M, 2015. – S. 75.
2. Ryahovskaya A.N. Problemy obespecheniya effektivnosti gosudarstvennogo antikrizisnogo upravleniya // ZHurnal «Upravlencheskie nauki». – 2019. – № 1. – Finuniversitet. – S. 20–27.
3. Ryahovskaya A.N., Kryukova O.G., Nasyrova G.A. Innovacionnaya deyatel'nost' vuzov: sostoyanie i perspektivy // Vestnik universiteta «Turan. – 2017. – № 3(75). – Almaty.
4. Ryahovskaya A.N., Kovan S.E. Vliyanie ekonomicheskih sankcij na platezhesposobnost' i finansovuyu ustojchivost' rossijskih kompanij. – Nauchnye trudy Vol'nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii, 2019. – T. 219. – S. 165–176.
5. Konstituciya Rossijskoj Federacii, st. 7.
6. Ryahovskaya A.N. Povyshenie effektivnosti antikrizisnyh mer Pravitel'stva Rossijskoj Federacii na 2019–2021 gg. // ZHurnal «Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo». – 2019. – № 1. – S. 68–74.
Review
For citations:
Ryakhovskaya A.N., Ryakhovskiy D.I. Complex approach for state anti-crisis management in a down economy. Bulletin of "Turan" University. 2020;(4):19-26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46914/1562-2959-2020-1-4-19-26
Views: 744
Email this article 