Preventing conflicts of i nterest: the policy of giving and accepting gifts in the civil service
https://doi.org/10.46914/1562-2959-2020-1-4-279-285
Abstract
The article raises the issue of conflict of interest and its prevention. The first threat of a conflict of interest in general is a violation of the balance between the personal interests of civil servants and the public interest. And the second risk is that a conflict of interest reduces the level of public trust and confidence in the loyalty and impartiality of public officials. This article analyzes and studies the real form of conflict of interest in Kazakhstan, namely two gift policy options. In particular, the zero gift policy and the limited gift ban policy are the subject of this research. On the one hand, the gift policy may completely prohibit accepting the gifts in order to prevent conflicts of interest. This zero gift policy implies that there is a ban for any gifts, regardless of the price. The establishment of a zero gift policy affects the level of confidence in the government, since citizens know that no factors affect the performance of a civil servant’s work. However, this will significantly restrict the freedom of action of civil servants. On the other hand, the gift policy can determine the rules for accepting the gifts both at workplace and after the work hours. If a gift is permissible, then there is a question of establishing an acceptable price. This means adopting a policy of limited prohibition on gifts and such a policy promotes the development of civil servants' consciousness. As a result, the author suggests a more favorable policy for Kazakhstan.
About the Author
M. D. NauryzbekKazakhstan
PhD student
References
1. Roe E. Narrative policy analysis: theory and practice. – Duke University Press, 1994. – URL: https:// www.sivioinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/Public_Policy_School/Introduction_to_Public_Policy_Making/Narrative-Policy-Analysis-Theory-and-Practice.pdf.
2. Carson T.L. Conflicts of interest // Journal of Business Ethics. 1994. T. 13. No. 5. P. 387–404.
3. Boyce G., Davids C. Conflict of interest in policing and the public sector: Ethics, integrity and social accountability // Public Management Review. 2009. T. 11. No. 5. P. 601–640.
4. Roberts R.N., Doss JrM.T. Public service and private hospitality: a case study in federal conflict-ofinterest reform // Public Administration Review. 1992. R. 260–270.
5. Fain H. The case for a zero gift policy // Public Integrity. 2002. T. 4. No. 1. R. 61–74.
6. Sybailas zhemқorlyққa қarsy іs-қimyl turaly. Қazaқstan Respublikasynyң Zaңy. 2015 zhylғy 18 қarashadaғy № 410–V ҚRZ. – URL: http://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/Z1500000410.
7. Әkіmshіlіk құқyқ bұzushylyқ turaly. Қazaқstan Respublikasynyң Kodeksі. 2014 zhylғy 5 shіldedegі № 235–V ҚRZ. – URL: http://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/K1400000235.
8. Қazaқstan Respublikasynyn Қylmystyқ kodeksi. Қazaқstan Respublikasynyң Kodeksі 2014 zhylғy 3 shildedegі № 226–V ҚRZ. – URL: http://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/K1400000226.
9. Agentstvo po protivodeistviyu korruptsii // Ob otvetstvennosti za darenie i poluchenie podarkov gossluzhashchimi. – 2019. – URL: https://www.gov.kz/memleket/entities/anticorruption/press/news/details/obotvetstvennosti-za-darenie-i-poluchenie-podarkov-gossluzhashchimi?lang=ru.
10. Fain H. The case for a zero gift policy // Public Integrity. 2002. T. 4. No. 1. R. 61–74.
11. Malaysian Anti – Corruption Committee // No gift policy in public sector. – URL: https://www.sprm.gov.my/index.php/en/maca/korporat/142-knowledge/770-no-gift-policy.
12. CNNPhilippines//No-giftpolicyingovernment.–2019.–URL:https://www.cnn.ph/videos/2019/8/22/No-gift-policy-in-government.html.
13. Қazaқstan Respublikasynyң keibіr zaңnamalyқ aktіlerіne sybailas zhemқorlyққa қarsy іs-қimyl mәselelerі boiynsha өzgerіster men tolyқtyrular engіzu turaly. Қazaқstan Respublikasynyң Zaңy 2020 zhylғy 6 қazandaғy № 365–VI ҚRZ. – URL: http://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/Z2000000365.
14. Improper Solicitation and Graft Act. No. 13278, Mar. 27, 2015. Amended by Act No. 16658, Dec 29, 2019. – URL: http://www.acrc.go.kr/en/data/3.0.Improper%20Solicitation%20and%20Graft%20Act.pdf.
15. Priimak A.V. Pravovoe regulirovanie polucheniya podarkov gosudarstvennymi i munitsipal'nymi sluzhashchimi Respubliki Koreya // Problemy sovremennoi nauki i obrazovaniya. – 2016. – № 17(59). – URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pravovoe-regulirovanie-polucheniya-podarkov-gosudarstvennymi-i-munitsipalnymi-sluzhaschimi-respubliki-koreya.
Review
For citations:
Nauryzbek M.D. Preventing conflicts of i nterest: the policy of giving and accepting gifts in the civil service. Bulletin of "Turan" University. 2020;(4):279-285. (In Kazakh) https://doi.org/10.46914/1562-2959-2020-1-4-279-285