A study of the level of development of the business ecosystem in the global digital economy
https://doi.org/10.46914/1562-2959-2025-1-3-94-110
Abstract
The digital transformation of the economy is marked by a fundamental shift in the logic of modern socioeconomic development. This process requires the accelerated creation of adaptation mechanisms at the micro, meso, and macro levels. The widespread adoption of digital technologies calls for new approaches to business organization and leads to the revision of traditional processes. Accordingly, the relevance of research aimed at introducing innovative technologies into various sectors of the economy, modernizing business processes, and enhancing entrepreneurial efficiency is increasing. The study is driven by the need to develop adaptive management approaches through the formation of business ecosystems. Their advantage lies in creating optimal value chains based on participants’ interaction and strengthening the capacity to adapt to dynamic external changes. The hypothesis suggests that business ecosystems, under conditions of digital transformation, enhance the efficiency of all participants. The purpose of the study is to develop and substantiate a methodological framework for building a management model of interaction among ecosystem participants aimed at improving entrepreneurial activity. The scientific significance is determined by clarifying methodological foundations for ecosystem formation and offering theoretical and practical recommendations to improve interaction management. The novelty lies in adaptive approaches to ecosystem management and a cluster-based model tailored to Kazakhstan’s real sector. The author’s contribution is reflected in advancing methods for assessing dynamic ecosystem development using time lags and quantitative indicators
About the Authors
A. B. MukhamedkhanovaKazakhstan
PhD, senior lecturer
Shymkent
V. N. Seitova
Kazakhstan
PhD, associate professor
Shymkent
S. S. Tamenova
Kazakhstan
c.e.s., professor
Almaty
B. D. Beknazarov
Kazakhstan
master, senior lecturer
Shymkent
References
1. Shvab K. (2017) Chetvjortaja promyshlennaja revoljucija. M., 207 p. (In Russian).
2. Bertalanfi L. fon. (1973) Istorija i status obshhej teorii sistem // Sistemnye issledovanija: metodologicheskie problemy: ezhegodnik. M.: Nauka. P. 20–37. (In Russian).
3. Moore J. (1996) The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems. New York: Harper Business, 297 p. (In English).
4. Ushachev I.G., Sandu I.S., Nechaev V.I. i dr. (2017) Prioritetnye napravlenija innovacionnogo razvitija APK sovremennoj Rossii: metodologicheskie podhody / pod red. I.S. Sandu i dr. – M.: Nauchnyj konsul'tant. 140 p. (In Russian).
5. Russell M., Still K., Huhtamäki J. et al. (2011) Transforming innovation ecosystems through shared vision and network orchestration // Proceedings of the Triple Helix IX International Conference. Stanford: Stanford University. URL: https://www.leydesdorff.net/th9/3NWAFYZH9_Russell.pdf (In English).
6. Klejner G.B. (2018) Social'no-jekonomicheskie jekosistemy v svete sistemnoj paradigmy // Sistemnyj analiz v jekonomike – 2018: sb. trudov V Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf.-biennale (Moskva, 21–23 nojabrja 2018 g.). M.: Prometej. P. 4–14. DOI: 10.33278/SAE-2018.rus.005-014. (In Russian).
7. Reeves M., Levin S., Ueda D. The Company as an Ecosystem: The Biology of Survival // Harvard Business Review Russia. URL: https://dev.hbrr.ru/biznes-i-obshchestvo/fenomeny/a17381. (In English).
8. Nambisan S., Wright M., Feldman M. (2019) The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: рrogress, challenges and key themes // Research Policy. Vol. 48(8). 103773. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.018. (In English).
9. Kraus S., Jones P., Kailer N., Weinmann A., Chaparro-Banegas N., Roig-Tierno N. (2022) Digital transformation and entrepreneurship: а systematic literature review // Review of Managerial Science. Vol. 16(4). P. 1033–1065. DOI: 10.1007/s11846-021-00453-w. (In English).
10. Cavallo A., Ghezzi A., Balocco R. (2019) Entrepreneurial ecosystem research: Present debates and future directions // International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. Vol. 15(4). P. 1291–1321. DOI: 10.1007/s11365-018-0526-3. (In English).
11. Autio E., Nambisan S., Thomas L.D.W., Wright M. (2018) Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems // Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal. Vol. 12(1). P. 72–95. DOI: 10.1002/sej.1266. (In English).
12. Malecki E.J. (2018) Entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems // Geography Compass. Vol. 12(3). e12359. DOI: 10.1111/gec3.12359. (In English).
13. Popov E.V. (2016) Seti: monografija. Ekaterinburg: AMB. 168 p. (In Russian).
14. What is a Digital Ecosystem? // Heads and Hands. URL: https://handh.ru/post/digital_ecosystem. (In English).
15. Pidun U., Reeves M., Schüssler M. (2019) Do You Need a Business Ecosystem? // Boston Consulting Group (BCG). URL: https://www.bcg.com/ru-ru/publications/2019/do-youneed-business-ecosystem. (In English).
16. Aarikka-Stenroos L., Ritala P. (2017) Network management in the era of ecosystems: Systematic review and management framework // Industrial Marketing Management. Vol. 67. P. 23–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.08.010. (In English).
17. Pigel B., Harrison R. (2018) Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystem // Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal. Vol. 12. No. 1. P. 151–168. (In English).
18. Qazaqstan Respublikasy strategialyq josparlau jäne reformalar jönındegı agenttıgınıñ ūlttyq statistika bürosy. 2023. URL: https://www.stat.gov.kz/ (ötınış berılgen kün: 22.04.2025). (In Kazakh).
19. Roundy P.T. (2019) Rust belt or revitalization: Competing narratives in entrepreneurial ecosystems // Management Research Review. Vol. 42. No. 1. P. 102–121. (In English).
20. Äljanova F.G., Dnişev F.M. (2019) Qazaqstan men Eurazialyq Ekonomikalyq Odaq elderındegı modernizasia jäne qūrylymdyq özgerıster mäselelerı // Ziatkerlık innovasialarğa investisialar. No. 3. P. 10. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.25198/2077-7175-2019-3-10. (In Kazakh).
21. Ahmetova G.T., Zhūmabekova A.T., Zhambylova G.Zh. (2019) QR auyl sharuashylyğyndağy innovacijalardyñ erekshelıkterı // Äleumettık zhäne gumanitarlyq ğylymdar serijasy. No. 2. P. 324. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.32014/2019.2224-5294.80. (In Kazakh).
22. Mamraeva D.G. (2020) İnnovasialardy komersialandyru prosesın zertteudıñ teorialyq aspektılerı // Qarağandy universitetınıñ ekonomika seriasynyñ habarşysy. No. 100(4). P. 79–92. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.31489/2020ec4/79-92. (In Kazakh).
23. Mukhamedkhanova A., Seidakhmetov M., Tulemetova A., Nursoy M. (2024) Innovation enterprise development strategy in animal husbandry // Scientific Horizons, no. 27(4), pp. 189–198. URL: https://doi.org/10.48077/scihor4.2024.189. (In English).
Review
For citations:
Mukhamedkhanova A.B., Seitova V.N., Tamenova S.S., Beknazarov B.D. A study of the level of development of the business ecosystem in the global digital economy. Bulletin of "Turan" University. 2025;(3):94-110. (In Kazakh) https://doi.org/10.46914/1562-2959-2025-1-3-94-110