Transformation of the national competitiveness paradigm: from M. Porter’s model to sustainable competitive advantages

The article examines the methodological limitations of traditional competitiveness theories amid the transition to a polycentric global economy. Using a four-dimensional analytical framework and systemic approach, the study demonstrates that M. Porter’s paradigm, while valuable at micro level, proves insufficient for explaining contemporary structural transformations marked by digitalization, economic sovereignty, and value chain fragmentation. Empirical analysis reveals that Porter’s “diamond” determinants explain only 55–60% of economic growth variations, indicating theoretical gaps. The research highlights digital transformation as a key challenge, fundamentally reconfiguring all components of traditional models through AI, platforms, and new business models. As a theoretical alternative, the article proposes the concept of Sustainable Competitive Advantages (SCA), integrating macroeconomic regulation, industrial policy, and regional cooperation. Using the EAEU and comparative cases (China, Singapore), the study demonstrates the effectiveness of strategic protectionism and industrial cooperation. The findings have practical significance for developing new competitiveness indicators and policy tools adapted to polycentric realities.

1. Delgado M., Ketels C., Porter M.E., Stern S. (2012) The Determinants of National Competitiveness, National Bureau of Economic Research, no. WP18249. URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w18249 (accessed: 10.09.2025) (In English).

2. Porter M.E., Ketels C.H.M. (2003) UK Competitiveness: Moving to the Next Stage. 60 p. (In English).

3. Porter M. (1993) Mezhdunarodnaya konkurentsiya. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 903 p. (In Russian)

4. Rodrik D. (2011) The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy, World Trade Review, no. 1(10), pp. 409–417. (In English).

5. Smit A. (2023) Issledovanie o prirode i prichinah bogatstva narodov. Moscow: Eksmo, 1056 p. (In Russian).

6. Rikardo D. (2022) Nachala politicheskoj ekonomii i nalogooblozheniya. Moscow, 576 p. (In Russian).

7. Solow R.M. (1956) A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, no. 1(70), pp. 65–94. (In English).

8. Shumpeter J.A. (2007) Teoriya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya. Kapitalizm, sotsializm i demokratiya. Moscow: Eksmo, 864 p. (In Russian).

9. Druker P.F. (1994) Effektivnyj upravlyayushchij. Moscow: Buk Chember Interneshnl: Ostozh’e, 267 p. (In Russian).

10. Porter M. (2016) Mezhdunarodnaya konkurentsiya: konkurentnye preimushchestva stran. Moscow: Alpina Pablisher, 947 p. (In Russian).

11. Rodrik D. (2015) Economics Rules: The Rights and Wrongs of the Dismal Science. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 272 p. (In English).

12. Dunning J.H. (2001) The Eclectic (OLI) Paradigm of International Production: Past, Present and Future, International Journal of the Economics of Business, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 173–190. (In English).

13. Manyika J. et al. (2017) A Future That Works: AI, Automation, Employment, and Productivity, McKinsey Global Institute Research, vol. 60, pp. 1–135. (In English).

14. World Economic Forum (2020) Annual Report 2019–2020. Geneva: WEF. URL: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Annual_Report_2019_2020.pdf (accessed: 10.09.2025) (In English).

15. Renjin P. (2020) The Fourth Industrial Revolution: At the Intersection of Readiness and Responsibility, Deloitte Development LLC. URL: https://www.forbes.com/sites/deloitte/2025/10/24/the-growth-transformersplaybook-ma-as-a-platform-for-growth/ (accessed: 10.09.2025) (In English).

16. Pilipenko I.V. (2003) Konkurentosposobnost’ regionov: analiz teorii klasterov M. Portera i regional’nyh klasterov M. Jenrajta // Goroda i gorodskie aglomeracii v regional’nom razvitii: sb. materialov XX ezhegodnoj sessii jekonomiko-geograficheskoj sekcii MARS, Pushhino, 23–25 maja 2003 g. / pod red. Ju.G. Lipeca. – M.: IG RAN. P. 86–94. (In Russian).

17. Robinson J.A., Acemoglu D. (2012) Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. London: Profile Books, pp. 45–47. (In English).

18. Shekhovtseva L.S. (2006) Strategicheskij menedzhment. Kaliningrad: Izd-vo RGU im. I. Kanta, 153 p. (In Russian).

19. Mazzucato M. (2013) The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. London: Anthem Press, pp. 45–48. (In English).

20. World Economic Forum (2020) Global Competitiveness Report, Special Edition 2020. Geneva: WEF, pp. 34–37. (In English).

21. Barney J.B. (1991) Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, Journal of Management, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 99–120. (In English).

22. Cole A. (2012) American Competitiveness: A Matter of National Security, 36 p. (In English).

23. Perskaya V.V., Eskindarov M.A. (2014) Konkurentosposobnost’ ekonomiki – strategicheskij prioritet natsional’noj bezopasnosti SShA//Strategicheskie prioritety. No. 2. P. 43–54. (In Russian).

24. Delgado M., Ketels C., Porter M.E., Stern S. (2012) The Determinants of National Competitiveness, Working Paper 18249, National Bureau of Economic Research, pp. 31–32. (In English).

25. Dijkstra L., Annoni P., Kozovska K.A. (2011) A New Regional Competitiveness Index: Theory, Methods and Findings, European Union Regional Policy Working Paper. December. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259357714_A_New_Regional_Competitiveness_Index_Theory_Methods_and_Findings/ (accessed: 15.07.2025) (In English).