The relationship between ESG indicators and financial performance in the context of integrated reporting: ERG company (2013–2024)
https://doi.org/10.46914/1562-2959-2026-1-1-128-140
Abstract
This study aims to empirically assess the relationship between ESG indicators and financial performance within the framework of integrated reporting. The relevance of the study is due to the growing need for large industrial enterprises in Kazakhstan to take into account the impact of ESG factors on strategic development and financial performance. The empirical basis of the study was provided by data from the integrated sustainability reports and financial statements of Eurasian Resources Group (ERG) for 2013–2024. The research methodology includes descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation coefficients, multiple linear regression, and dynamic graphical analysis. CO 2 emissions, social investments, and the proportion of independent directors were used as ESG variables, while net profit was used as a financial result. The results demonstrate a strong negative correlation between CO2 emissions and net profit, while social investments and the proportion of independent directors have a positive impact on financial performance. The multiple regression model allowed us to quantify the contribution of ESG factors and showed that corporate governance is the most significant predictor of financial performance. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the first comprehensive and empirically grounded analysis of ESG financial interrelationships at the firm level in the Kazakh context within the framework of integrated reporting. The practical significance lies in the formation of scientifically sound and applied recommendations for integrating ESG metrics into strategic planning, risk management, and improving corporate sustainability.
About the Authors
M. K. KalibayevKazakhstan
PhD, associate professor
Almaty
А. Erkaboev
United Kingdom
PhD, lecturer
Reading
References
1. Abakumova O. (2015) Opyt gosudarstvennoj podderzhki malogo i srednego biznesa v stranah Evropejskogo sojuza // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. No. 10(89). P. 62–63. (In Russian).
2. Alikulov T.M. (2022) ESG körsetkışterınıñ käsıporyndardyñ qarjylyq nätijelerıne äserı // Ekonomika jäne statistika. No. 1. P. 35–42. (In Kazakh).
3. Ahmetov S.T., Ismagulov Zh.K. (2022) Rol' vnutrennego audita v realizacii ustojchivogo razvitija v Kazahstane // Қarzhy zhәne audit. No. 15(4). P. 45–58. (In Russian).
4. Älımqūlova G.J. (2021) Tūraqty damu konsepsiasynyñ teorialyq negızderı // Ekonomika jäne qūqyq mäselelerı. No. 3(19). P. 12–20. (In Kazakh).
5. Global'naja iniciativa po otchetnosti (GRI). Standarty GRI 2021. Amsterdam: Global Reporting Initiative, 2021. 340 p. (In Russian).
6. Danijarova A.K. (2023) ESG-strategija v upravlenii kompanijami gornodobyvajushhej otrasli Kazahstana // Jekonomika: strategija i praktika. No. 2. P. 85–94. (In Russian).
7. Carlsson B., Acs Z., Audretsch D., Braunerhjelm P. (2009) Knowledge Creation, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Growth: A Historical Review // Industrial and Corporate Change. No. 18. P. 1193–1229. (In English).
8. European Commission. Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). Brussels, 2022. 52 p. (In English).
9. Qazaqstan Respublikasy strategialyq josparlau jäne reformalar jönındegı agenttıgınıñ ūlttyq statistika bürosy. URL: https://www.stat.gov.kz/ (ötınış berılgen kün: 21.04.2024). (In Kazakh).
10. Qazaqstan Respublikasynyñ Ekologialyq kodeksı (01.07.2021 j. jaña redaksia). Astana, 2021. (In Kazakh).
11. OECD. ESG Investing: Practices, Progress and Challenges. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2022. 112 p. (In English).
12. Ordabaev D.A. (2021) Jauapty investisialar jäne tūraqty qarjylandyru // Qarjy-qarajat. No. 4. Р. 23–29. (In Kazakh).
13. SASB. Sustainability Accounting Standards Board: Conceptual Framework. San Francisco, 2020. 68 p. (In English).
14. TCFD. Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. Basel: FSB, 2017. 33 p. (In English).
15. UNCTAD. Guidance on Core Indicators for Entity Reporting on Contribution towards Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals. Geneva: United Nations, 2021. 94 p. (In English).
16. United Nations. Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. – New York: UN, 2015. 41 p. (In English).
17. World Economic Forum. Measuring Stakeholder Capitalism: Towards Common Metrics and Consistent Reporting of Sustainable Value Creation. Geneva: WEF, 2020. 100 p. (In English).
18. Yermankulova G., Omarov A. (2023) ESG disclosure and firm performance in emerging markets // Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment. Vol. 13(4). P. 721–739. (In English).
19. Zhang L., Li W. (2022) ESG and corporate financial performance: Evidence from global markets // Finance Research Letters. Vol. 47. Р. 102807. (In English).
20. Zhou X., Wang S. (2021) Corporate Governance, ESG, and Firm Value: Evidence from China // Emerging Markets Review. Vol. 48. Р. 100758. (In English).
Review
For citations:
Kalibayev M.K., Erkaboev А. The relationship between ESG indicators and financial performance in the context of integrated reporting: ERG company (2013–2024). Bulletin of "Turan" University. 2026;(1):128-140. (In Kazakh) https://doi.org/10.46914/1562-2959-2026-1-1-128-140
JATS XML















