Assessment of the relationship between economic growth, energy consumption and environmental pollution in Сentral Asian countries

In Central Asian countries, there is a complex relationship between economic growth, energy consumption, and environmental pollution. An increase in economic production is often accompanied by an increase in energy consumption, which, in turn, can lead to an increase in pollutant emissions. However, there are opportunities to break this link, for example, by increasing energy efficiency and switching to renewable energy sources. Taking into account the environmental goals stated at different levels of the global community, the main purpose of this study is to test the relationship between economic growth, greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption – the so-called “3E” model. This allows us to develop recommendations for different countries. An analysis of the Central Asian (CA) countries using panel data and time series for the period 1990–2024 revealed significant changes in the relationship between these three variables, especially as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, some countries have managed to achieve decoupling of emissions and economic growth. Nevertheless, the persistence of carbon-intensive energy consumption patterns in Central Asian countries remains a major obstacle, underscoring the need to step up efforts to introduce green technologies and transition to sustainable economic development.

1. Sobirov Y., Tukhtamurodov A., Karimov M., Bekjanov D., Avezov M. (2023) The impact of energy consumption, FDI, and economic growth on CO2 emissions in Central Asia. Empirical evidence from panel ARDL // E3S Web Conf, no. 449, pp. 04002. URL: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344904002 (In English).

2. Kurmanov N., Kenzhin Z., Aldabergenov N., Satbayeva A., Mussabalina D. (2025) Sustainable Development Challenges in CentralAsia: Empirical Evidence on the CO2-Growth-Energy-Employment Nexus // International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, no. 15(6), рр. 371–380. URL: https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.21322 (In English).

3. Essadik E., Khalifa J. (2024) Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Its Socio-Economic Drivers Nexus: Empirical Evidence from MENA Countries // International Journal of Economy, Energy and Environment, no. 9(2), рр. 32–50. URL: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeee.20240902.11 (In English).

4. Turmunkh B.E. (2020) Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy Consumption, CO2 Emissions and Economic Growth in a Developing Country: Empirical Evidence from Kazakhstan // Asian Development Perspectives, no. 11(2), рр. 106–121. URL: https://doi.org/10.22681/ADP.2020.11.2.106 (In English).

5. Caporin M., Cooray A., Kuziboev B., Yusubov I. (2024) New insights on the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) for Central Asia // Empirical Economics, no. 66(5), рр. 2335–2354. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-023-02520-9 (In English).

6. Nguyen A.T. (2019) The Relationship between Economic Growth, Energy Consumption and Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Evidence from Central Asia // Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, no. 12(24), рр. 1–15. URL: https://doi.org/10.17015/ejbe.2019.024.01 (In English).

7. Wang J., Azam W. (2024) Natural resource scarcity, fossil fuel energy consumption, and total greenhouse gas emissions in top emitting countries // Geoscience Frontiers, no. 15(2), рр. 101757. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101757 (In English).

8. Francés G.E., Marín-Quemada J.M., González E.S.M. (2013) RES and risk: Renewable energy’s contribution to energy security. A portfolio-based approach // Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, no. 26, рр. 549–559. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.06.015 (In English).

9. Ouyang X., Li Q., Du K. (2020) How does environmental regulation promote technological innovations in the industrial sector? Evidence from Chinese provincial panel data // Energy Policy, no. 139, рр. 111310. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111310 (In English).

10. González-Álvarez M.A., Montañés A. (2023) CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth: Determining the stability of the 3E relationship // Economic Modelling, no. 121, рр. 106195. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106195 (In English).

11. Rogelj J., Huppmann D., Krey V., Riahi K., Clarke L., Gidden M., Nicholls Z, Meinshausen M. (2019) A new scenario logic for the Paris Agreement long-term temperature goal // Nature, no. 573, pp. 357–363. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1541-4 (In English).

12. Karavias Y., Tzavalis E. (2019) Generalized fixed-T panel unit root tests // Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, no. 46, pp. 1227–1251. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/sjos.12392 (In English).

13. Bai J., Perron P. (1998) Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes // Econometrica, no. 66(1), pp. 47–78. URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2998540 (In English).

14. Hubacek K., Chen X., Feng K., Wiedmann T., Shan Y. (2021) Evidence of decoupling consumptionbased CO2 emissions from economic growth // Advances in Applied Energy, no. 4, pp. 100074. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adapen.2021.100074 (In English).

15. Cohen G., Jalles J.T., Loungani P., Marto R. (2018) The long-run decoupling of emissions and output: Evidence from the largest emitters // Energy Policy, no. 118, pp. 58–68. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.028 (In English).

16. Freire-González J., Padilla Rosa E., Raymond J.L. (2024) World economies’ progress in decoupling from CO2 emissions // Scientific Reports, no. 14, pp. 20480. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-71101-2 (In English).

17. Ehigiamusoe K.U., Lean H.H., Smyth R. (2020) The moderating role of energy consumption in the carbon emissions-income nexus in middle-income countries // Applied Energy, no. 261, pp. 114215. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12186-w (In English).

18. Balcilar M., Bekun F.V., Uzuner G. (2019) Revisiting the economic growth and electricity consumption nexus in Pakistan // Environmental Science and Pollution Research, no. 26, pp. 12158–12170. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04598-0 (In English).

19. Cai Y., Sam C.Y., Chang T. (2018) Nexus between clean energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions // Journal of Cleaner Production, no. 182, pp. 1001–1011. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.035 (In English).

20. VVP na dushu naselenija po PPS (v postojannyh mezhdunarodnyh dollarah 2017 goda) // Baza dannyh Vsemirnogo banka. URL: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.CD?locations=1W (data obrashhenija: 01.07.2025) (In Russian).

21. Vybrosy parnikovyh gazov na dushu naselenija v jekvivalente CO_2 // Baza dannyh World in Data. URL: https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-greenhouse-gas-emissions (data obrashhenija: 01.07.2025) (In Russian).

22. Potreblenie pervichnoj jenergii na dushu naselenija (kVt.ch/chel.) // Baza dannyh World in Data. URL: https://ourworldindata.org/energy (data obrashhenija: 01.07.2025) (In Russian).

23. Granger C.W., Newbold P. (1974) Spurious regressions in econometrics // Journal of Econometrics, no. 2, pp. 111–120. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(74)90034-7 (In English).

24. Dickey D.A., Fuller W.A. (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root // Journal of the American Statistical Association, no. 74(366), pp. 427–431. URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2286348 (In English).

25. Perron P. (1989) The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis // Econometrica, no. 57(6), pp. 1361–1401. URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/1913712 (In English).

26. Zivot E., Andrews D.W.K. (2002) Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis // Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, no. 20, pp. 25–44. URL: https://doi.org/10.1198/073500102753410372 (In English).

27. Banerjee A., Lumsdaine R.L., Stock J.H. (1992) Recursive and sequential tests of the unit-root and trend-break hypotheses: Theory and international evidence // Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, no. 10, pp. 271–287. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1992.10509905 (In English).

28. Lumsdaine R.L., Papell D.H. (1997) Multiple trend breaks and the unit-root hypothesis // The Review of Economics and Statistics, no. 79(2), pp. 212–218. URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/003465397556791 (In English).

29. Ditzen J., Karavias Y., Westerlund J. (2021) Testing and estimating structural breaks in time series and panel data in Stata // Econometrics, no. 2110, pp. 14550. URL: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2110.14550 (In English).

30. Pesaran M.H., Smith R. (1995) Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels // Journal of Econometrics, no. 68, pp. 79–113. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01644-F (In English).