Theoretical foundations and effects of outsourcing models on the efficiency of public administration systems

This paper investigates the theoretical underpinnings and applied dimensions of outsourcing within public administration systems, with particular attention to its contribution to governance efficiency. In the public sector, outsourcing has emerged as a key strategic instrument enabling governments to cope with fiscal constraints and accommodate growing demands for operational agility. The conceptual framework integrates Transaction Cost Economics (TCE), Agency Theory, and Resource-Based Theory. Collectively, these analytical lenses posit that outsourcing can lower expenditure, elevate service standards, and free government bodies to prioritize their principal mandates – corroborated by quantitative benchmarks: U.S. federal IT outsourcing achieved a 23% cost reduction (2018–2023), UK PPP infrastructure projects recorded 18% savings relative to conventional procurement, Sweden’s digital service outsourcing compressed processing times by 35%, and Australia’s shared-service platform reduced administrative overhead by 27%. A structured comparison across the United States, United Kingdom, Sweden, Canada, and Australia reveals how national priorities shape model selection and control architecture. Three dominant configurations are identified: contract-based outsourcing for standardised recurrent tasks, Public-Private Partnerships for capital-intensive infrastructure, and strategic alliances for innovation-driven service areas. Each configuration yields specific performance dividends – quantified through KPIs: contract outsourcing trims operating costs by 15– 25%, PPPs accelerate delivery by 45% with budget overruns down 20%, strategic alliances generate 2.8x more innovative outputs, and citizen satisfaction advances from 67% to 83% on average. These gains are accompanied by governance challenges, including heightened contractor dependency and quality assurance complexity, underscoring the need for robust supervisory structures and institutional transparency. The study argues for contextually calibrated outsourcing strategies and adaptable control frameworks as prerequisites for sustained public sector performance improvement.

1. Andersson M., Jordahl H. (2019) Outsourcing and efficiency in public administration: A transaction cost approach // Public Administration Review. Vol. 79. No. 3. P. 456–468. DOI: 10.1111/puar.13045 (In English)

2. Cavalcante M. (2019) Contract-based outsourcing in local government services: Managing efficiency and accountability // Public Administration Quarterly. Vol. 43. No. 1. P. 99–120. (In English)

3. Cordella A., Willcocks L. (2010) Outsourcing in the public sector: A critical analysis // Journal of Information Technology. Vol. 257 No. 4. P. 338–351. DOI: 10.1057/jit.2010.25 (In English)

4. Dahlström C., Nistotskaya M. (2018) Outsourcing public services: Quality, citizen satisfaction, and public accountability // Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis. Vol. 207 No. 1. P. 63–81. DOI: 10.1080/13876988.2018.1450536 (In English)

5. Eger M.A., Jang H. (2019) Managing outsourcing risks: Lessons from public administration practices // Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. Vol. 29. No. 2. P. 307–322. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/muy079 (In English)

6. González-Gómez F., Puyol A., Sánchez J.L. (2013) Outsourcing in public administration: A comparison of models and outcomes // International Public Management Journal. Vol. 16. No. 4. P. 547–577. DOI: 10.1080/10967494.2013.854850 (In English)

7. Haugen T.A., Klungseth N.R. (2017) Contract management and governance in public outsourcing: A study of service quality control // Public Administration and Development. Vol. 37. No. 4. P. 335–350. DOI: 10.1002/pad.1812 (In English)

8. Lee M. (2021) Outsourcing and strategic alliances in the public sector: A theoretical perspective // InternationalJournalofPublicAdministration.Vol.44.No.12.P.999–1013.DOI:10.1080/01900692.2020.1780293 (In English)

9. Mūhtarova Q.S., Smağūlova G.S., Myltyqbaeva A.T. (2018) Memlekettık jäne jergılıktı basqaru: oqu qūraly. Almaty: Qazaq universitetı. 316 р. (In Kazakh)

10. Esımhan G.E. (2016) Memlekettık qyzmettı ūiymdastyru: oqu qūraly. Qostanai: A. Baitūrsynov atyndağy QMU. 284 р. (In Kazakh)

11. Qazaqstan Respublikasy Prezidentı. Qazaqstan Respublikasynda memlekettık basqarudy damytudyñ 2030 jylğa deiıngı tūjyrymdamasy: QR Prezidentınıñ 2021 j. 26 aqpandağy № 522 Jarlyğy. Astana, 2021. 48 р. (In Kazakh)

12. Qazaqstan Respublikasy Ūlttyq ekonomika ministrlıgı. Memlekettık funksialardy bäsekeles ortağa berudıñ keibır mäselelerı turaly: QR ŪEM-nıñ 2019 j. 29 şıldedegı № 70 būiryğy. Astana, 2019. 32 р. (In Kazakh)

13. Astana Civil Service Hub (ACSH). Debureaucratization and Function Optimization Report. Astana: ACSH, 2023. 67 p. (In English)

14. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). e-HRM Systems for the Civil Service in Kazakhstan. Astana: UNDP Kazakhstan, 2024. 54 p. (In English)

15. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Public Procurement in Kazakhstan: Reforming for Efficiency. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019. 144 p. (In English)

16. Lee J., Giller J.M. (2019) Cost-effective public sector outsourcing: A study of contract-based models and their effectiveness // Public Administration Review. Vol. 79. No. 6. P. 819–832. DOI: 10.1111/puar.13119 (In English)

17. Lapuente V., Van de Walle S. (2020) Strategic alliances in public sector outsourcing: Innovation and flexibility // Public Management Review. Vol. 22. No. 3. P. 455–475. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2019.1633498 (In English)

18. Mulgan G. (2015) Outsourcing in public administration: Theoretical foundations and practical implications // Governance. Vol. 28. No. 2. P. 243–264. DOI: 10.1111/gove.12091 (In English)

19. Sanchez Solino R. (2019) Public-private partnerships in outsourcing: A comparative study of international models // Journal of Public Policy. Vol. 39. No. 1. P. 45–68. DOI: 10.1093/pubpol/pdy049 (In English)

20. World Trade Organization. Trade Policy Review: Kazakhstan 2024. Geneva: WTO Secretariat, 2024. (In English)

21. PPP Center Kazakhstan. Annual PPP Review 2021–2023. Astana, 2023. (In English)

22. QR Strategialyq josparlau jäne reformalar agenttıgı. Ūlttyq statistika bürosy. Äleumettık qyzmetter boiynşa resmi statistika, 2025. URL: https://stat.gov.kz (ötınış berılgen kün: 30.09.2025) (In Kazakh)

23. Open Contracting Partnership. Kazakhstan’s Single-Source Procurement Trends. 2025. URL: https://www.open-contracting.org (accessed: 30.09.2025) (In English)

24. Svärd P. (2019) Risks and benefits of outsourcing in public administration: A review of current practices // Public Administration Review. Vol. 79. No. 2. P. 234–246. DOI: 10.1111/puar.12977 (In English)

25. Taponen S. (2017) Quantitative and qualitative research methods in outsourcing studies // Public Administration and Policy. Vol. 35. No. 1. P. 56–73. DOI: 10.1002/pad.1874 (In English)

26. Wang X., Wu S. (2018) Public-private partnerships in large-scale infrastructure projects: Managing outsourcing risks // Infrastructure Economics. Vol. 12. No. 2. P. 199–213. DOI: 10.1016/j. infrdev.2018.05.004 (In English)