Preview

Bulletin of "Turan" University

Advanced search

Models and mechanisms of higher education financing: a comparative analysis and positioning of Kazakhstan

https://doi.org/10.46914/1562-2959-2026-1-2-472-486

Abstract

Relevance: amid the transformation of public governance, the choice of optimal mechanisms for the budget financing of higher education institutions (HEIs) is gaining scholarly and practical importance, since the funding model directly shapes universities’ incentives to improve quality, research, and innovation. Purpose: to systematize the basic models and mechanisms of higher education financing used in global practice and to determine the position of the Kazakhstani system within this typology. Methodology: the study draws on comparative, structural, and institutional analysis. The theoretical framework distinguishes the institutional model (the HEI as the object of funding) and the demand-based model (the student as the object of funding), with three generations of mechanisms within the former: line-item, formula-based, and performance-based funding (PBF). Scientific significance: the study systematizes current global practice (2020–2026) of HE funding models and offers an original positioning of Kazakhstan’s state educational order within the international typology. Value: the research identifies specific systemic gaps between Kazakhstani practice and international standards across key parameters, namely the share of HE expenditure in GDP, the level of financial autonomy of HEIs, and the presence of performance-based funding mechanisms. Practical significance: the findings can be used in developing policy decisions to improve the financing of Kazakhstani HEIs in line with the 2023–2029 Concept, as well as in teaching the economics of education and public administration.

About the Authors

D. A. Ashirbekova
Turan University
Kazakhstan

doctoral student

Almaty



G. Zh. Nurmukhanova
Turan University
Kazakhstan

d.e.s., professor 

Almaty



D. I. Ryakhovskiy
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

d.e.s., professor

Moscow



References

1. Dmitrienko A.S. (2023) Obzor modelej finansirovaniya vysshego obrazovaniya: mekhanizmy dovedeniya sredstv i rol’ gosudarstva. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i municipal’nogo upravleniya. No. 2. P. 146– 171. DOI: 10.17323/1999-5431-2023-0-2-146-171 (In Russian)

2. Jongbloed B. (2003) Institutional Funding and Institutional Change. Real-time systems: Reflections on higher education in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovenia. Brno: Vutium. P. 115–146. (In English)

3. OECD. Education at a Glance 2025: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2025. URL: https://www.oecd.org/education/education-at-a-glance/ (accessed: 01.03.2025) (In English)

4. Babin M., Erić M. (2015) Institutional financing vs. demand financing in higher education // Finding the right path higher education financing and social dimension in the western Balkan countries. Belgrade: University of Belgrade. P. 29–41. (In English)

5. Pruvot E.B., Claeys-Kulik A.L., Estermann T. (2015) Strategies for efficient funding of universities in Europe // The European Higher Education Area. Cham: Springer. P. 153–168. (In English)

6. De Boer H., Jongbloed B. et al. (2015) Performance-based funding and performance agreements in fourteen higher education systems. Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS). 94 p. (In English)

7. Narbaev T. et al. (2025) A decade of transformation in higher education and science in Kazakhstan. Education Sciences. Vol. 15. No. 3. P. 1597. (In English)

8. Jonbekova D., Kuchumova G., Kim T., Mukhamejanova D., Gimranova D., Abdildin Y., Alimkhanova D. (2025) Motivations, benefits, and challenges of university-industry partnerships in Kazakhstan. International Journal of Educational Research. Vol. 130. Art. 102486. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102486 (In English)

9. OECD. Higher Education in Kazakhstan 2017. Reviews of National Policies for Education. Paris: OECD Publishing , 2017. DOI: 10.1787/9789264268531-en (In English)

10. World Bank, UNESCO. Education Finance Watch 2024. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2024. URL: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/education/publication/education-finance-watch (accessed: 01.03.2025) (In English)

11. Pruvot E.B., Popkhadze N., Estermann T. (2023) University Autonomy in Europe IV: The Scorecard 2023. Brussels: European University Association (EUA). URL: https://eua.eu/publications/reports/universityautonomy-in-europe-iv-the-scorecard-2023.html (accessed: 01.03.2025) (In English)

12. Fu Y. (2023) Research funding allocation and performance of Chinese universities. Higher Education. Vol. 86. No. 4. P. 761–781. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-022-00934-5 (In English)

13. U.S. Department of Education. Federal Student Aid Annual Report FY 2023. Washington, DC: Department of Education. 2023. URL: https://studentaid.gov (accessed: 01.03.2025) (In English)

14. Kontseptsiya razvitiya vysshego obrazovaniya i nauki Respubliki Kazakhstan na 2023–2029 gody. URL: https://adilet.zan.kz (data obrashcheniya: 01.03.2025) (In Russian)

15. Zakon Respubliki Kazakhstan «Ob obrazovanii» ot 27 iyulya 2007 g. No. 319-III (s izm. ot 10.07.2023 g.). URL: https://adilet.zan.kz (data obrashcheniya: 01.03.2025) (In Russian)

16. Jongbloed B. (2004) Funding higher education: options, trade-offs and dilemmas. Fulbright Brainstorms 2004 – New Trends in Higher Education. Lisbon. (In English)

17. Dougherty K.J., Natow R.S. (2020) Performance-based funding for higher education: how well does neoliberal theory capture neoliberal practice? Higher Education. Vol. 80. No. 3. P. 457–478. (In English)

18. Marcucci P.N., Johnstone D.B. (2007) Tuition fee policies in a comparative perspective. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. Vol. 29. No. 1. P. 25–40. (In English)

19. Kalenyuk I., Grishnova O., Tsymbal L., Djakons D. (2021) Features of result-based financing higher education. Vestnik NAN RK. No. 2. P. 50–57. (In English)

20. Salmi J. (2023) The Transformative Impact of Academic Excellence Initiatives. International Higher Education. No. 115. P. 7–9. (In English)

21. Research Excellence Framework 2021: Overview report by Main Panel A. (2022) REF 2021. URL: https://ref.ac.uk (accessed: 01.03.2025) (In English)

22. Jongbloed B., de Gayardon A. (2023) Does Performance-Based Funding Work? AEuropean Perspective. International Higher Education. No. 113. P. 30–31. (In English)

23. Issayeva A.D., Baimagambetova L.K. (2024) Kompleksnyj otraslevoj obzor rynka vysshego obrazovaniya Kazahstana: trendy i vyzovy. Vestnik universiteta «Turan». No. 1(101). P. 337–354. (In Russian)

24. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Government expenditure on education as % of GDP, Kazakhstan. URL: https://uis.unesco.org (accessed: 08.06.2026) (In English)

25. Zakon Respubliki Kazahstan «O respublikanskom byudzhete na 2025–2027 gody» (byudzhetnaya programma 204). URL: https://adilet.zan.kz (accessed: 08.06.2026) (In Russian)

26. Vysshee i poslevuzovskoe obrazovanie v Respublike Kazahstan: statisticheskij sbornik. Bureau of National Statistics ASPR RK. Astana, 2024. URL: https://stat.gov.kz (accessed: 08.06.2026) (In Russian)


Review

For citations:


Ashirbekova D.A., Nurmukhanova G.Zh., Ryakhovskiy D.I. Models and mechanisms of higher education financing: a comparative analysis and positioning of Kazakhstan. Bulletin of "Turan" University. 2026;(2):472-486. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46914/1562-2959-2026-1-2-472-486

Views: 21

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1562-2959 (Print)
ISSN 2959-1236 (Online)