The role of Kazakhstan’s ethnocultural heritage in economic development and the formation of tourism brand capital

This article examines Kazakhstan’s ethnocultural heritage in relation to economic development and the formation of tourism brand capital. The preservation of cultural and historical values is directly linked to their appropriate use in tourism. National traditions, historical sites, crafts, and local cultural features reflect the country’s distinctive identity and can increase tourist interest. They can also support the development of regional service industries and create opportunities for new tourism products. The study aims to assess the relationship between ethnocultural resources, the tourism economy, investment attractiveness, and tourism brand capital using empirical data. The study involved 40 respondents. The survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics, the Shapiro–Wilk test, factor analysis, Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient, and multiple regression analysis. The responses showed that participants placed a high value on ethnocultural heritage, authenticity, and the attractiveness of the tourism brand. The factor analysis identified three dimensions relating to cultural value, marketing support, and investment potential. The regression analysis revealed positive relationships between the attractiveness of tourism brand capital and ethnocultural value (β=0.42; p=0.001), authenticity (β=0.31; p=0.008), and marketing support (β=0.27; p=0.015). The model explained 61% of the variation in the indicator under consideration (R²=0.61). The findings indicate that ethnocultural heritage has economic potential in addition to its cultural significance. Its appropriate use in tourism development may contribute to regional economic diversification, support entrepreneurial and investment activity, and strengthen the competitive advantages of tourism destinations. Measures intended to preserve cultural heritage should therefore be coordinated with tourism branding strategies and regional economic development plans.

1. Aldybayev B. et al. Popularization of objects of the cultural and historical heritage of the Republic of Kazakhstan as a factor for the development of ethnocultural tourism of the country // GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites. 2021. Vol. 39. P. 1450–1460.

2. Dwyer L., Forsyth P. Tourism economics and policy. Bristol: Channel View Publications, 2010. 318 p.

3. Richards G. Cultural tourism and creative economy // Tourism Management Perspectives. 2021. Vol. 37. Article 100780.

4. Tiberghien G. Neo-nomadic culture as a territorial brand for «authentic» tourism development in Kazakhstan // Europe-Asia Studies. 2020. Vol. 72. No. 10. P. 1728–1751. DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2020.1776842

5. OECD. Rethinking Regional Attractiveness in the New Global Environment. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2023. 151 p. URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/a9448db4-en

6. Tiberghien G. Managing the planning and development of authentic eco-cultural tourism in Kazakhstan // Tourism Planning & Development. 2019. Vol. 16. No. 5. P. 494–513. DOI: 10.1080/21568316.2018.1501733.

7. Tiberghien G., Bremner H., Milne S. Authenticating eco-cultural tourism in Kazakhstan: a supply side perspective // Journal of Ecotourism. 2018. Vol. 17. No. 3. P. 306–319. DOI: 10.1080/14724049.2018.1502507.

8. OECD. The impact of culture on tourism. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2008. 156 p. DOI: 10.1787/9789264040731-en

9. Seidualin D., Mussina K., Mukanov A. Leveraging territorial branding for sustainable development and tourist attraction: case of Ulytau, Kazakhstan // GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites. 2025. Vol. 58. No. 1. P. 61–77. DOI: 10.30892/gtg.58106-1391

10. OECD. Local Identity, Pride and Branding in Place Transformation: Stories that Shape Places. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2026. 125 p. URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/9ccee12a-en

11. Likert R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes // Archives of Psychology. 1932. Vol. 22. No. 140. P. 1–55.

12. Shapiro S.S., Wilk M.B. An analysis of variance test for normality: complete samples // Biometrika. 1965. Vol. 52. No. 3–4. P. 591–611. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591

13. Kaiser H.F. The Varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis // Psychometrika. 1958. Vol. 23. No. 3. P. 187–200. DOI: 10.1007/BF02289233

14. Cronbach L.J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests // Psychometrika. 1951. Vol. 16. No. 3. P. 297–334. DOI: 10.1007/BF02310555

15. Montgomery D.C., Peck E.A., Vining G.G. Introduction to linear regression analysis. 5th ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2012. 645 p.