Development of population farms abroad: features of name and support measures

In this article, the formulated reference names of alternative variants of farms of the population abroad, which are small objects of management in the agricultural sector, are widely studied. Alternative versions are used to define and describe the features and similarities of the population with the economic concept. It is explained that the variety of definitions of names is related to local national characteristics. In addition, important information from a number of foreign scientists is presented, describing small forms of economic management of the population, various reflections, explaining reference names. A number of reference names are associated with local national characteristics. It is noted that in the Western literature, the concept of personal subsidiary farming coincides with the concepts of family farming or semi-farm farming, while the term does not coincide with one form of farming in Kazakhstan, but corresponds to two types, i.e., the objects of farming and the economy of the public, as well as their various infrastructure and statistics. As an example, the equivalents of farms in the United States and Canada were studied, the state of their development, the existing support measures in these countries were considered, and generalizing features were found on the basis of which the scheme of support measures was developed.

ауыл шаруашылығы, агроөнеркәсіптік кешен, жеке қосалқы шаруашылық, жұртшылық шаруашылық, фермерлік шаруашылық, кооператив, қолдау шаралары, сельское хозяйство, агропромышленный комплекс, личное подсобное хозяйство, хозяйство населения, фермерское хозяйство, кооператив, меры поддержки, agriculture, agro-industrial complex, personal subsidiary farming, individual farms, farming, cooperative, support measures

1. Shinet G., Myrzaliev B., Ydyrys S. Conceptual Approaches to the Study of Nature of Private Ownership of Private Subsidiary Farming during Post-Socialist Transformation in Agricultural Sector // Journal of Advanced Researchin Law and Economics Biannually. 2016. Vol. 7. Issue 2(16). - P. 350-363.

2. Есполов Т.И., Григорук В.В. Формирование рыночной системы земельных отношений в Казахстане. - Алматы: Изд-во Агроуниверситета, 2002. - 45 с.

3. Нурбекова Ж. Социологический анализ личных подсобных хозяйств сельского населения как неформального вида предпринимательской деятельности // Евразийское сообщество. - 2004. - № 3(47). - С. 105.

4. Мырзалиев Б.С., Шінет Г.Ғ. Халық шаруашылықтарының жұмыс жасау тиімділігін арттыру - Қазақстанды азық-түлікпен қамтамасыз ету факторы // Аграрлық нарық проблемалары. - 2016. - № 1. - Б. 23-27.

5. Шінет Г.Ғ., Абдибеков С.У., Исаева Г.К. Justification of methodolical approach to definition of the direction of development of the personal husbandries // Вестник ЕНУ им. Л.Н. Гумилева. Экономическая серия. - 2019. - № 4.

6. Башмачников В.Ф. Роль семейных фермерских хозяйств в развитии отрасли сельского хозяйства в США // АПК: регионы России. - 2012. - № 8. - С. 12-16.

7. Манько Т.Г., Лобанова О.И. Подсобные, приусадебные хозяйства и промыслы: указ. отеч. литературы. - М.: ЦНСХБ, 1994. - 50 с.

8. Асанов Қ.Ә. Ауыл шаруашылығын өркендету жүйесі жөніндегі ұсыныстар Шымкент облысы. - Алматы: Қайнар, 1978. - 400 б.