Corporate social responsibility and sustainable business strategies of small and medium businesses
https://doi.org/10.46914/1562-2959-2025-1-3-432-447
Abstract
The article examines the interrelationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and sustainable business strategies in the small and medium-sized business (SMB) sector. The relevance of the study lies in the growing role of CSR as a factor that directly influences competitiveness, investment attractiveness, and the social legitimacy of enterprises. The main purpose of the research was to identify the impact of CSR integration on the resilience of business models and to substantiate CSR as a strategic foundation for long-term growth. The study is theoretical and review-based, relying on the analysis of scientific publications, international organizational reports, and empirical data. Systemic, comparative-analytical, and contextual approaches were applied, complemented by elements of content analysis and conceptual modeling, which enabled the identification of intersections between CSR and sustainable business strategies. The findings indicate that the evolution of CSR, from philanthropy and sponsorship to the strategic integration of ESG principles and the creation of shared value, has transformed the understanding of its role in business. CSR enhances corporate reputation, mitigates ESG-related risks, and builds trust among consumers, investors, and society at large. For SMBs, the main barriers remain limited resources, weak institutional support, and a short planning horizon. However, evidence from European and Kazakhstani practices confirms that CSR integration strengthens business models and creates new sources of competitive advantage. The value of the study lies in the development of an integrative model that positions CSR as a fundamental element of sustainable strategies. Its practical significance is reflected in the potential application of the proposed framework for improving strategic planning in SMBs and for fostering long-term “win-win” solutions for business and society
About the Authors
K. S. SuleimenKazakhstan
PhD student
Аlmaty
G. Zh. Tayauova
Kazakhstan
PhD, associate professor
Аlmaty
C. Bektas
Turkey
PhD, professor
Tokat
References
1. Tret'jakov O.V. (2016) Teoretiko-metodologicheskie podhody k izucheniju social'noj otvetstvennosti biznes-struktur // Gorizonty jekonomiki. No. 5. P. 92–100. (In Russian).
2. Solovej T.N. (2021) Social'naja otvetstvennost' kompanij: motivacija, tendencii i perspektivy // Razvitie territorij. No. 3(25). P. 28–37. (In Russian).
3. Beljaeva I.Ju., Puhova M.M. (2016) Sovershenstvovanie sistemy korporativnoj social'noj otvetstvennosti putem integracii v sistemu korporativnogo upravlenija // Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo jekonomicheskogo universiteta. No. 1. P. 79–83. (In Russian).
4. Bataeva B.S., Cheglakova L.M., Melitonjan O.A. (2020) Social'no otvetstvennoe povedenie kompanij malogo i srednego biznesa v Rossii: kross-kul'turnye koordinaty G. Hofstede // Rossijskij zhurnal menedzhmenta. V. 18. No. 2. P. 155–188. (In Russian).
5. Badykova I.R. (2021) Korporativnaja social'naja otvetstvennost' kak upravlencheskaja innovacija. M. 210 p. (In Russian).
6. Stoian C., Gilman M. (2017) Corporate social responsibility that pays: а strategic approach to CSR for SMEs // Journal of Small Business Management. Vol. 55. No. 1. P. 5–31. (In English).
7. Visser W. (2011) The age of responsibility: CSR 2.0 and the new DNA of business. John Wiley & Sons. 320 p. (In English).
8. Elkington J., Rowlands I.H. (1999) Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business // Alternatives Journal. Vol. 25. No. 4. P. 42–46. (In English).
9. Pojasek R.B. (2011) ISO 26000 guidance on Social Responsibility // Environmental Quality Management. Vol. 20. No. 3. P. 85–93. (In English).
10. Beattie A. (2015) The three pillars of corporate sustainability. Investopedia. URL: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/corporate-sustainability.asp (accessed: 10.03.2025). (In English).
11. Lindgreen A., Swaen V. (2010) Corporate social responsibility // International Journal of Management Reviews. Vol. 12. No. 1. P. 1–7. (In English).
12. Khurshid H., Snell R.S. (2022) Examining distinctions and relationships between creating shared value (CSV) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) in eight Asia-based firms // Asian Journal of Business Ethics. Vol. 11. No. 2. P. 327–357. (In English).
13. Becerra-Vicario R., Palacios-González M.M., et al. (2020) Sustainable development through corporate social responsibility, corporate philanthropy and creating shared value // Technium Social Sciences Journal. Vol. 10. P. 291–305. (In English).
14. Schaltegger S., Lüdeke-Freund F., Hansen E.G. (2012) Business cases for sustainability: The role of business model innovation for corporate sustainability // International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development. Vol. 6. No. 2. P. 95–119. (In English).
15. Schaltegger S., Wagner M. (ed.). (2017) Managing the business case for sustainability: the integration of social, environmental and economic performance. Routledge. 400 p. (In English).
16. Velte P. (2022) Meta-analyses on corporate social responsibility (CSR): a literature review // Management Review Quarterly. Vol. 72. No. 3. P. 627–675. (In English).
17. Vlijanie integracionnyh processov na razvitie kazahstanskoj jekonomiki // articlekz.com. URL: https://articlekz.com/article/28060 (data obrashhenija: 10.03.2025). (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Suleimen K.S., Tayauova G.Zh., Bektas C. Corporate social responsibility and sustainable business strategies of small and medium businesses. Bulletin of "Turan" University. 2025;(3):432-447. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46914/1562-2959-2025-1-3-432-447